I second that, the KC-135 workhorse will outnumber the future KC-X for an extensive period. It will serve the Air Force for an unprecedented length of time with modifications and will remain a valuable asset. But all of this is mainly dependent of funding in the foreseeable future.The new USAF KC-X tanker,NOT coming to an airbase near you any time soon.
Which base will host the 60th anniversary celibrations for the KC-135?.
Let's hope there are no catastrophic fatigue failures in the KC-135 fleet in the coming years.tva2 wrote:..Le Addeur noir...I second that, the KC-135 workhorse will outnumber the future KC-X for an extensive period. It will serve the Air Force for an unprecedented length of time with modifications and will remain a valuable asset. But all of this is mainly dependent of funding in the foreseeable future.The new USAF KC-X tanker,NOT coming to an airbase near you any time soon.
Which base will host the 60th anniversary celibrations for the KC-135?.
Let's hope there are no catastrophic fatigue failures in the KC-135 fleet in the coming years.
They are well maintained,but their age goes against them.
Any ideas of the average KC-135 flying hours per airframe?.
Time for the Antonov consortium to protest. Not being allowed to be even considered for turning up a few minutes late (for whatever reason), now another few months needed for any decision, just taken by the US Air Force. Maybe time to make the rules even for ALL parties involved, scrap the whole contract and hire AAR from your allies when it is needed.tva2 wrote:...."Pentagon won't meet air tanker deadline..."....
Not a chance .. >>aviodromefriend wrote:Time for the Antonov consortium to protest. Not being allowed to be even considered for turning up a few minutes late (for whatever reason), now another few months needed for any decision, just taken by the US Air Force. Maybe time to make the rules even for ALL parties involved, scrap the whole contract and hire AAR from your allies when it is needed.
Ah, of course not, it will make the USA dependable from another nation, and the most likely ally willing to offer AAR will depend on non-Boeing equipment.
That would be interesting indeed. Most allies depend heavily on the US for AAR! For training but foremost operational purposes... Not a chance in hell that this bid will be scrapped.aviodromefriend wrote:scrap the whole contract and hire AAR from your allies when it is needed.
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more