Scramble Messageboard

The Airshow Display website said "more info in the beginning of 2025", however I can't find any updates yet. Anybody who speaks better French than me with more info?

Both TDY tankers seem to be going home today, 14-2, as seen on ADSB.

Mag ik geen hoop uitspreken dat iets bewaard blijft? Ik doe mijn best mijn bijdrage te leveren aan de info op Scramble, zowel op het forum als in de databases. Had ik maar meer tijd..... Geen woorden in mijn mond leggen, uiteraard mag je van mij hopen wat je wil! Maar er is vast en zeker ruimte voo...

Mag ik geen hoop uitspreken dat iets bewaard blijft?
Ik doe mijn best mijn bijdrage te leveren aan de info op Scramble, zowel op het forum als in de databases. Had ik maar meer tijd.....

Hear hear!
Maar ja, dat is helaas een gepasseerd station. Hopelijk blijven in elk geval alle data bewaard, dan maar digitaal. Want die data zijn van onschatbare waarde wat mij betreft.

But if you ever get the chance to scan some parts of that book, I would be highly interested! Send me your email and I send you some photos of the book. Hoi, ik probeer je een private message te sturen, maar dat wordt geweigerd. Reden: "Some users couldn’t be added as they have disabled privat...

The Boom XB-1 looks very ugly to me, but I understand your reference to a historic flight! Nice report!

Hoi, ik heb dit nog steeds, nagenoeg elke keer dat ik het forum (of de website) open op mijn laptop moet ik opnieuw inloggen. Maakt niet uit hoe vaak ik "ingelogd blijven" aanklik. Erg irritant. Van andere websites worden inloggegevens en zo wel onthouden, dus het lijkt niet aan de laptop ...

That's a bit far for me, currently....

But if you ever get the chance to scan some parts of that book, I would be highly interested!

N401A K-225 pr (ex BuNo 125478) Regarding the K-225, some sources say this went to the USCG as YHOK-1C with serial 1239 before reverting back to its civil serial, who knows more? Help with the last operational units of the three indicated aircraft would also be very welcome. I have this info regard...

dutchphantom wrote: ↑09 Jan 2025, 04:21 0860/78-6060 is not a AT-5 but AT-3.
Taiwan does not have SH-60's, they are S-70's.

You're right of course, 0860 was a visiting AT-3, a copy-paste error.
And indeed the Navy Sea Hawk is an S-70.

BennoT6 wrote: ↑09 Jan 2025, 07:30 good day Patrick, Stefan,

"214" is not a T-6G, but it's a Noorduyn AT-16-ND Harvard IIB

Regards,

Benno

Thanks Benno. Out of curiousity, I know you are THE Harvard expert, but where is this info based on? Scramble database has it as AT-6 and Andy Marden gives T-6G as type.

Google translate gives Air Force Flight School. My source is a book about the history of the ROCAF with a lot of drawings and old photos. Unfortunately it is in Chinese. But it is a good reference for badges. Come to visit me and I will show you. OK, thanks! I believe you ;-) The book sounds very p...

skippyscage wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025, 19:27

Plus decoy F-5s: (5179/50352, 5206/60476, 5216/60486, 5226/61621, 5235/61630)

out of these, which of these are the 3 opposite the Carrefour?

No idea. I put them between brackets as we didn't read them. From the Carrefour they are nose on, as you probably have seen as well.