Hi,
I just published an article on the China Aviation Museum, but in this particular case I think it might be useful to do a 'photo page' as I think this might be helpful to ID the airframes - although my images are not always top quality
What are your thoughts about that?
Regards,
H.
Xiaotangshan / Datangshan
Forum rules
Discussions related to the Scramble Aviation Wiki (encyclopedia). |
- Een echte spotter
- Moderator
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: 20 Jun 2004, 04:21
- Location: Oranjestad, Aruba
- Contact:
Not at all, Homer.
We were discussing this and decided it would be a nice addition to the museum page... We sort of forgot to give you an answer....
Go ahead and set up a photo page, I'll check in later to see how you are doing (maybe help a little with the internal Wiki linking...).
One thing though, the pics you have at the moment are fine, we would appreciate it if you stick to the size you use now (unfortunately we do not have unlimited server space, so bigger pics would eventually cause problems....)
Have fun.... and Thanks for the new addition to the Wiki.
We were discussing this and decided it would be a nice addition to the museum page... We sort of forgot to give you an answer....
Go ahead and set up a photo page, I'll check in later to see how you are doing (maybe help a little with the internal Wiki linking...).
One thing though, the pics you have at the moment are fine, we would appreciate it if you stick to the size you use now (unfortunately we do not have unlimited server space, so bigger pics would eventually cause problems....)
Have fun.... and Thanks for the new addition to the Wiki.
- Een echte spotter
- Moderator
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: 20 Jun 2004, 04:21
- Location: Oranjestad, Aruba
- Contact:
- Hans
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 4047
- Joined: 24 Aug 2002, 11:07
- Type of spotter: S5 - Military & Civil
- Subscriber Scramble: Yep
- Location: The Net
- Contact:
Hi,
I'd like to add some comments myself;
First of all, the photo-page is looking good already! (at least, I suppose there will be more to come?)
But our, at least mine, main concern is that the wiki is supposed to be an encyclopedia where images are more then welcome, but only as clarification of the information given in the articles. It is not a place just to "dump" your images without actually writing or enhancing articles. In this particular case I don't think that is the case, but we've seen that happening in the past.
So as far as I'm concerned, just go ahead!!!
Regards,
Hans
I'd like to add some comments myself;
First of all, the photo-page is looking good already! (at least, I suppose there will be more to come?)
But our, at least mine, main concern is that the wiki is supposed to be an encyclopedia where images are more then welcome, but only as clarification of the information given in the articles. It is not a place just to "dump" your images without actually writing or enhancing articles. In this particular case I don't think that is the case, but we've seen that happening in the past.
So as far as I'm concerned, just go ahead!!!
Regards,
Hans