 | This is the forum to share your older or theme-based aviation photos, under the same conditions as the parent forum. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). |
Dino, I absolutely like the idea. However, long after giving up on participating in every nice topic here, I even gave up on viewing every photo topic. It simply takes too much of my time. This is a topic I would like to contribute to, especially as I plan to make slides for possibly ten more years, but I know I will hardly make time for it...dinovandoorn wrote:Just to prevent that we need to create a lot more " tribute to... " topic's
Make sure that the quality is more than reasonable before dropping every shot here.
Wow! This pic made my day. Absolutely superb!dinovandoorn wrote:
It depends on several other factors aswell, such as the quality of the analog camera + lens which was used, the quality of the film which was used. Because there is a big difference between Hema/Dixons own brand and Afga slides or even better Kodachrome 64 or Fuji Sensia 100 for example.Thijs wrote:Totally agree with you. But what i want to know, which scanner did all of you use? the pictures shown here are of good quality, and the type of scanner is part of it. Next to some experience with PS
Stunning picture!!!dinovandoorn wrote:
