Not a spectacular day, but with the Qatar A300 and the Cathay B744 was the day a success.
Please comment, to improve the photos.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Schiphol [16-07-2011]
Forum rules
 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
Schiphol [16-07-2011]
Went with a friend to Schiphol today.
Not a spectacular day, but with the Qatar A300 and the Cathay B744 was the day a success.
Please comment, to improve the photos.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Not a spectacular day, but with the Qatar A300 and the Cathay B744 was the day a success.
Please comment, to improve the photos.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Last edited by Mark.O on 16 Jul 2011, 20:47, edited 1 time in total.
/klm.gif)
Re: Schiphol [16-07-2011]
Nice, but some of them are unscharp. Check your exposure of number 3 
Also try to keep your horizon horizontally. And the last one, check your pictures that you don't cut of things of an airplane, like the emirates 747 winglet or like number 10 the engine.
Also try to keep your horizon horizontally. And the last one, check your pictures that you don't cut of things of an airplane, like the emirates 747 winglet or like number 10 the engine.
Last edited by Charlie1 on 20 Apr 2014, 20:09, edited 1 time in total.
/american.gif)
Re: Schiphol [16-07-2011]
let's get on and show the CK pic of today?!
-
Gietje
/koreanair.gif)
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 3418
- Joined: 03 May 2009, 14:33
- Type of spotter: If it's got wings and engines...
- Subscriber Scramble: Gideon van Dijk
- Location: Rotterdam
Re: Schiphol [16-07-2011]
Not to be rude or something, but what kind of remark is that?TNCA wrote:let's get on and show the CK pic of today?!
If someone had a pic of it and had the time to upload one they'd probably have done it by one. Otherwise you will probably have to wait, or it's not coming at all.
/polar.gif)
Re: Schiphol [16-07-2011]
When I passed EHAM yesterday on the A4 Highway, it seemed a Delta 747 came off rwy 24. Anyone can confirm this? As I was driving I could not look all the time, but it looked like a Delta -400 
Time was like 11.15AM
Cheers,
Time was like 11.15AMCheers,
Cheers
Re: Schiphol [16-07-2011]
one picture then....
-
Andras
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1108
- Joined: 20 Jul 2008, 11:18
- Type of spotter: Photo only
- Location: Bearing 210 from EHLW 70 NM
- Contact:
Re: Schiphol [16-07-2011]
I agree with Ramon, a lot of close-ups or similar compositions, by cutting off parts. If you like that then be my guestCharlie1 wrote:Nice, but some of them are unscharp. Check your exposure of number 3
Also try to keep your horizon horizontally. And the last one, check your pictures that you don't cut of things of an airplane, like the emirates 747 winglet or like number 10 the engine.
Regards,
Ramon
Try and look outside the box with compositions and don't be hasty, the unsharp ones look like "movement-unsharpness", take your time when shooting..@Cool T7 Erwin.. First timer over here?
Greets,
Re: Schiphol [16-07-2011]
Yep new airframe.