Really, you think?McLanahan wrote:Are these confirmed serials, because MM7009 is not a Tornado but a Fiat CR-42...Starfighter_F-104G wrote:MM7009
MM7087
Cheers,
Pat
2 x ITAF tornado collision
Forum rules
 |
-
nellis6
- Scramble Senior
- Posts: 333
- Joined: 13 Mar 2008, 14:23
- Type of spotter: Modern Military Photographer
- Location: Aylesbury, England
- Contact:
Re: 2 x ITAF tornado collision
-
Bennie
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 16562
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 15:12
- Type of spotter: Military (numbers & photography)
- Subscriber Scramble: Ofcourse
- Location: @ home, @ work or elsewhere in the world!
Re: 2 x ITAF tornado collision
Only if you don't look any further than the length of your nose....nellis6 wrote:Really, you think?McLanahan wrote:Are these confirmed serials, because MM7009 is not a Tornado but a Fiat CR-42...Starfighter_F-104G wrote:MM7009
MM7087
Cheers,
Pat
Ben
Scramble member, reader & contributor since 1984
Scramble member, reader & contributor since 1984
-
frank kramer
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 4678
- Joined: 28 Jun 2003, 21:58
- Subscriber Scramble: frank kramer
- Location: het kan in Almere
Re: 2 x ITAF tornado collision
Fact is, it does not pop up in the Scramble database right away. This is because it was last noted as CSX7009 in 2011, when it was with the industry for update to MLU RET-7 status. As such (CSX7009) it can be found in the DB. It would be safe to assume that this update had been finished and the aircraft had reverted back to its original serial; apparently, it had not been noticed since (and unfortunately it won't be seen again, given the tragic circumstances leading to this post 
)
)
Last edited by frank kramer on 27 Aug 2014, 09:48, edited 1 time in total.
Frank Kramer
Always going forward... still can't find reverse!
Always going forward... still can't find reverse!
-
Bennie
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 16562
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 15:12
- Type of spotter: Military (numbers & photography)
- Subscriber Scramble: Ofcourse
- Location: @ home, @ work or elsewhere in the world!
Re: 2 x ITAF tornado collision
Fact is, that there are other sources than the Scramble DB (which will retain its high quality level if everyone submits his changesfrank kramer wrote:Fact is, it does not pop up in the Scramble database right away. This is because it was last noted as CSX7009 in 2011, when it was with the industry for update to MLU RET-7 status. As such (CSX7009) it can be found in the DB.
)...Ben
Scramble member, reader & contributor since 1984
Scramble member, reader & contributor since 1984
-
frank kramer
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 4678
- Joined: 28 Jun 2003, 21:58
- Subscriber Scramble: frank kramer
- Location: het kan in Almere
-
McLanahan
- Scramble Junior
- Posts: 204
- Joined: 18 Aug 2006, 22:38
- Subscriber Scramble: McLanahan
- Location: Princeton-Plainsboro Teaching Hospital
Re: 2 x ITAF tornado collision
Thanks Frank!frank kramer wrote:Fact is, it does not pop up in the Scramble database right away. This is because it was last noted as CSX7009 in 2011, when it was with the industry for update to MLU RET-7 status. As such (CSX7009) it can be found in the DB. It would be safe to assume that this update had been finished and the aircraft had reverted back to its original serial; apparently, it had not been noticed since (and unfortunately it won't be seen again, given the tragic circumstances leading to this post
Since this is a Scramble forum I obviously checked the Scramble database, and MM7009 gave a Fiat. I think I can do without the snappy remarks though!
Everybody lies