ehusmann wrote:but some of the choppers were I think.
No, the write off Chinooks in Afghanistan were due to hard or bad landings, damaging beyond repair. After that it were the Dutch forces themselves that blew them up.
KIER wrote:For your knowledge ; the Lynx helicopter is after more than 25 years, still the fastest helicopter in the world.
Wrong, that record has been broken last year (by a S-92 IIRC).
jp 74 wrote:Maybe a lesson learned fot the DoD that whitout a proper csar chopper and backup (fighters or gunship and special forces) a resue in a hostile country is nearly impossable.
If you decide to take a 3 crewed lynx for such a task you can expect trouble.
As far as information is given by the MoD at this point, it was a time-critical situation to get the people out. So looking at a Lynx onboard of a frigate that is sailing not so far away from the Libyan shore is not such a stupid thing. Where should all that support be drawn from? We don't have F-16s in Italy anymore dealing with the Balcan conflict!
Polecat wrote:don't think nowadays anyone would consider a two-for-three swap successful, or even any mission where men have to be left behind...
Part of joining the military is that you accept you can get in such a situation, contrary to the civilian people that were supposed to be rescued. If you (as being Lynx-crew, not a poster at Scramble) don't like it, you should have joined a civil operator (there are some at basically the same airfield as where the Lynx has its home).
Thermal wrote:Unbelievable, the Brits successfully get hundreds of people out without the Lybians knowing it.
The Dutch have to pick up 2 (!!) people and f*ck up.
So far the Germans and Britons have been lucky with their transport missions in Lybia.
Lucky? I call it 'better prepared'
The British have prepared, that is for sure. They had time to inform their people by infiltrating Special Forces. From what we know in this case there wasn't any time to prepare here, due to the at once occuring situation, that appeared to be time critical.