Spangdahlem (ETAD/SPM) - 2008
Forum rules
Mode S / SBS and radio logs, airfield specific, are allowed, but always state your source, mode S / SBS or air traffic conversations. These logs can be placed in the "day topic" so a separate Mode S / SBS radio log is not necessary |
A-10 80-0281/SP (marked 81 FS) was photographed today at Bagram AB, Afghanistan. See "Oldest USAFE A-10 performing CAS": http://www.bagram.afnews.af.mil/news/st ... =123093620" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Stafhunter
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: 28 Apr 2006, 13:49
- Subscriber Scramble: Stafhunter
- Location: Tilburg
- Contact:
Spangdahlem 18-04-08 13:00u
86-0015 C-5B
00-0175 C-17A
02-1109 C-17A
Spangdahlem 20-04-2008 11:30u and 19:00u
87-0030 C-5B
87-0040 C-5B
00-0183 C-17A
02-1107 C-17A
03-3116 C-17A
Spangdahlem 22-04-2008 11:30u
69-0025 C-5A
87-0030 C-5B
99-0062 C-17A
00-0175 C-17A
Spangdahlem 23-04-2008 10:50u
177702 CC-177
69-0025 C-5A
87-0030 C-5B
87-0040 C-5B
99-0062 C-17A
00-0178 C-17A
01-0194 C-17A
02-1108 C-17A
60-0347?? KC-135R depart when i was driving in Binsfeld
86-0015 C-5B
00-0175 C-17A
02-1109 C-17A
Spangdahlem 20-04-2008 11:30u and 19:00u
87-0030 C-5B
87-0040 C-5B
00-0183 C-17A
02-1107 C-17A
03-3116 C-17A
Spangdahlem 22-04-2008 11:30u
69-0025 C-5A
87-0030 C-5B
99-0062 C-17A
00-0175 C-17A
Spangdahlem 23-04-2008 10:50u
177702 CC-177
69-0025 C-5A
87-0030 C-5B
87-0040 C-5B
99-0062 C-17A
00-0178 C-17A
01-0194 C-17A
02-1108 C-17A
60-0347?? KC-135R depart when i was driving in Binsfeld
F-104 Starfighter patch website http://threshold.nl" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
flown in:
F27-300M C-5
better a spotter with stepladder behind me than a spotter with 50mm in front off me
flown in:
F27-300M C-5
better a spotter with stepladder behind me than a spotter with 50mm in front off me
Special thanks for your latest info, Maurizio! I also remember a listing already posted by Kostas above. And this night, I found the following related HAI company news: http://www.haicorp.com/html/en/news-20080320.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
See also: http://www.f-16.net/news_article2852.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Related to that, on F-16.net I launched a new topic "CCIP upgrade for USAFE F-16s by HAI Tanagra": http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-10356.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Anybody from the Scramble community who can/will help us to watch and document this process? The F-16.net Team would be very grateful for any support!
See also: http://www.f-16.net/news_article2852.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Related to that, on F-16.net I launched a new topic "CCIP upgrade for USAFE F-16s by HAI Tanagra": http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-10356.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Anybody from the Scramble community who can/will help us to watch and document this process? The F-16.net Team would be very grateful for any support!
- phantom_phixer
- Scramble Junior
- Posts: 110
- Joined: 11 Jul 2004, 12:49
- Type of spotter: F2
- Subscriber Scramble: phantom_phixer
- Location: LGTG
-
- Scramble Senior
- Posts: 404
- Joined: 10 Sep 2002, 20:15
- Type of spotter: military spotting
- Location: Aviano, Italy
Blade 01 delivered to HAI on 14th (Blade 01) and 91-0481 delivered back to 52 FW on 17th (Blade 01), both fuel stopped at Aviano.Another SP Viper came in last week, while an AV jet came in the day before yesterday.
If it is of any interest I'll get you the numbers when I get back from some... well deserved RnR
Kostas, can you sent an up-dated situation at Tanagra?. Believe the 31 FW haven't received any CCIP (from HAI) yet.
M.
New shots of Spang "Hogs" which are still deployed with the 81st EFS to Bagram AB, Afghanistan, were released today: http://www.spangdahlem.af.mil/news/stor ... =123095898" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And so, at least the following five of either ten or twelve deployed jets are identified by USAF photos: 80-0281 (marked 81 FS), 81-0963, 81-0976, 81-0983 and 81-0992.
And so, at least the following five of either ten or twelve deployed jets are identified by USAF photos: 80-0281 (marked 81 FS), 81-0963, 81-0976, 81-0983 and 81-0992.
- maurits
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1679
- Joined: 27 Apr 2004, 23:36
- Type of spotter: full military
- Subscriber Scramble: maurits
- Location: IJsselstein
Hi,
About the deployed Spang A-10s. If there no aircraft changed during the period Jan-Apr also 81-0978,81-0980,82-0649(dep 4/1), 81-0984(dep 5/1),
12 a/c in total should be at Baghram. Possible other a/c are there as well:
79-0207,81-0945,81-0952,81-0954'81FS'. Maybe 1 or 2 are replaced...
Just wait and see when the Warthogs are coming back.
Maurits
About the deployed Spang A-10s. If there no aircraft changed during the period Jan-Apr also 81-0978,81-0980,82-0649(dep 4/1), 81-0984(dep 5/1),
12 a/c in total should be at Baghram. Possible other a/c are there as well:
79-0207,81-0945,81-0952,81-0954'81FS'. Maybe 1 or 2 are replaced...
Just wait and see when the Warthogs are coming back.
Maurits
Maurits! Instead of 81-0954 (probably according to older scramble stuff), currently 80-0281 is special marked 81 FS as the squadron´s flagship. See: http://www.bagram.afnews.af.mil/news/st ... =123093620" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The exact number of deployed 81st EFS "Hogs" is still unknown to me. But I can say the following: It´s possible that air spares left Spang alongside the main package at least en route to the first stopover point (probably Sigonella). But it should be unrealistic that the 81st EFS replaced any deployed aircraft. And if yes, then two replacements must be deployed - related to the well-known wingman principle.
But as Maurits said: Just wait and see when the Warthogs are coming back.
The exact number of deployed 81st EFS "Hogs" is still unknown to me. But I can say the following: It´s possible that air spares left Spang alongside the main package at least en route to the first stopover point (probably Sigonella). But it should be unrealistic that the 81st EFS replaced any deployed aircraft. And if yes, then two replacements must be deployed - related to the well-known wingman principle.
But as Maurits said: Just wait and see when the Warthogs are coming back.
- DJMikey
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: 26 Jun 2003, 16:48
- Location: Den Bosch, Netherlands
- Contact:
Seen 30-04-2008 at Spangdahlem.
F16CJ, DJ, locals:
91-0343/SP, 91-0391/SP, 91-0338/SP, 90-0818/SP, 91-0418/SP,
90-0828/SP, 91-0344/SP, 91-0388/SP, 91-0402/SP, 91-0360/SP,
90-0843/SP, 91-0417/SP
Visitors:
C17A USAF: 00-0183, 99-0170/AK, 04-4131, 90-0532, 98-0050
C17A Canadian Forces: 177702
Grt,
Niels Hoogenboom, Hans v. Lierop, Mike Schoenmaker.
F16CJ, DJ, locals:
91-0343/SP, 91-0391/SP, 91-0338/SP, 90-0818/SP, 91-0418/SP,
90-0828/SP, 91-0344/SP, 91-0388/SP, 91-0402/SP, 91-0360/SP,
90-0843/SP, 91-0417/SP
Visitors:
C17A USAF: 00-0183, 99-0170/AK, 04-4131, 90-0532, 98-0050
C17A Canadian Forces: 177702
Grt,
Niels Hoogenboom, Hans v. Lierop, Mike Schoenmaker.
Mike Schoenmaker
Vice-president / Activities / PR
KNVOL, region Noord-Brabant / Noord Limburg
Vice-president / Activities / PR
KNVOL, region Noord-Brabant / Noord Limburg