USAF KC-46A Tanker Update
Forum rules
- Canberra TT.18
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1065
- Joined: 23 Jun 2003, 21:55
- Type of spotter: S4
- Location: Beuningen (Gld)
- Canberra TT.18
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1065
- Joined: 23 Jun 2003, 21:55
- Type of spotter: S4
- Location: Beuningen (Gld)
- Starbucks
- Scramble Senior
- Posts: 495
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 20:27
- Type of spotter: Female (Cabin) Crew
- Subscriber Scramble: Starbucks
- Location: Hillegom, Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: USAF KC-X Tanker Update
Ok that sucks
My spidy sense tells me that the WTO dispute probably played a role in the decision although they said it didn't....
My spidy sense tells me that the WTO dispute probably played a role in the decision although they said it didn't....
Re: USAF KC-X Tanker Update
BOEING INDEED
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/b ... ker25.html
This is the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) Phase only......!
I sincerely hope this saga is over , getting tired keeping this updated
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/b ... ker25.html
This is the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) Phase only......!
I sincerely hope this saga is over , getting tired keeping this updated
Last edited by tva2 on 24 Feb 2011, 23:30, edited 1 time in total.
Groeten
Tim Voerman
Tim Voerman
- Flyboy
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 2719
- Joined: 14 Sep 2006, 09:39
- Type of spotter: F4
- Subscriber Scramble: Flyboy
- Location: Hillywood
- Contact:
Re: USAF KC-X Tanker Update
You could not expect anything else, given the previous exercises...
- lievers-online
- Scramble Junior
- Posts: 215
- Joined: 08 Jul 2009, 09:47
- Type of spotter: Rather take a picture of the moment
- Subscriber Scramble: tja
Re: USAF KC-X Tanker Update
Indeed, but although many are not happy with this result it means job security to a lot of Boeing employees and those are not only Americans,..I sincerely hope this saga is over , getting tired keeping this updated
Re: USAF KC-X Tanker Update
Bummer, this evening seems to be full of unpleasant surprises so far... ah well, at least the world keeps on turning...
Erwin
Erwin
Re: USAF KC-X Tanker Update
Which i'm thankfull for!tva2 wrote: I sincerely hope this saga is over , getting tired keeping this updated
I guess those DOD official who do the acquisition can't afford mistakes after 10 years. I find it pathatic how those pro Boeing senetars acted in all this, bunch of wankers.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Re: USAF KC-46A Tanker Update
Much obliged !bigfoot wrote: Which i'm thankfull for!
Groeten
Tim Voerman
Tim Voerman
- Flyboy
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 2719
- Joined: 14 Sep 2006, 09:39
- Type of spotter: F4
- Subscriber Scramble: Flyboy
- Location: Hillywood
- Contact:
Re: USAF KC-46A Tanker Update
The very last question yesterday was a good one. Something like 'How do you explain that Boeing is the clear winner in the competition, while in te previous competition for the same plane EADS was the clear winner?' They couldn't give a suitable reply and left the scene in a hurry..
I'd say: Europe stop the with the JSF and buy European. Praise the US for their point of view and reply to them in the same manner. Mind you that Europe has twice the number of inhabitants, the Euro is a stronger currency and that if we realise that we can play the same game on their rules and be better in it.
I'd say: Europe stop the with the JSF and buy European. Praise the US for their point of view and reply to them in the same manner. Mind you that Europe has twice the number of inhabitants, the Euro is a stronger currency and that if we realise that we can play the same game on their rules and be better in it.
Re: USAF KC-46A Tanker Update
Reply to Ryboy
It eventually boiled down to less fuel consumption and price for Boeing KC-46A. Even both candidates met all mandatory requirements they simply did the arithmetic. The EADS KC-45A is a heavier airplane and 24% more fuel burn. The US taxpayer gets more bang for its bucks.
Interview at King5
Info credit & copyright © 2011 King Broadcasting Company,
http://www.king5.com/news/business/Boei ... 48933.html
...."Boeing's air tanker contract win leaves officials shocked, disappointed"....
Info credit & copyright © 2011 Alabama Live LLC.
http://blog.al.com/live/2011/02/boeings ... ct_wi.html
...."Boeing won air tanker contract due to 'Chicago politics', says Richard Shelby"....
Info credit & copyright © 2011 Alabama Live LLC.
http://blog.al.com/live/2011/02/boeing_ ... tract.html
It eventually boiled down to less fuel consumption and price for Boeing KC-46A. Even both candidates met all mandatory requirements they simply did the arithmetic. The EADS KC-45A is a heavier airplane and 24% more fuel burn. The US taxpayer gets more bang for its bucks.
Interview at King5
Info credit & copyright © 2011 King Broadcasting Company,
http://www.king5.com/news/business/Boei ... 48933.html
...."Boeing's air tanker contract win leaves officials shocked, disappointed"....
Info credit & copyright © 2011 Alabama Live LLC.
http://blog.al.com/live/2011/02/boeings ... ct_wi.html
...."Boeing won air tanker contract due to 'Chicago politics', says Richard Shelby"....
Info credit & copyright © 2011 Alabama Live LLC.
http://blog.al.com/live/2011/02/boeing_ ... tract.html
Groeten
Tim Voerman
Tim Voerman
Re: USAF KC-46A Tanker Update
And that's what counts. No matter who won the previous competition, or the one before that: this is what really matters in air tanking. And that's why a converted C-5 wouldn't make a good airtankertva2 wrote:It eventually boiled down to less fuel consumption and price for Boeing KC-46A. Even both candidates met all mandatory requirements they simply did the arithmetic. The EADS KC-45A is a heavier airplane and 24% more fuel burn. The US taxpayer gets more bang for its bucks.
== All is well, as long as we keep spinning ==
- Flyboy
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 2719
- Joined: 14 Sep 2006, 09:39
- Type of spotter: F4
- Subscriber Scramble: Flyboy
- Location: Hillywood
- Contact:
Re: USAF KC-46A Tanker Update
Question remains if the changed requirements (for the tanker, compared with the previous game) came from an operational point of view, or that it was addapted to suit a specific design. We'll never know I gues. Bigger secrets have been kept secret for years.
Re: USAF KC-46A Tanker Update
tva2 wrote:Reply to Ryboy
The US taxpayer gets more bang for its bucks. .....l[/url]
say what!. We are talking about airtankers! No bangs please!
Very well put (.......) But how can you be sure about the last?Flyboy wrote:The very last question yesterday was a good one. Something like 'How do you explain that Boeing is the clear winner in the competition, while in te previous competition for the same plane EADS was the clear winner?' They couldn't give a suitable reply and left the scene in a hurry..
I'd say: Europe stop the with the JSF and buy European. Praise the US for their point of view and reply to them in the same manner. Mind you that Europe has twice the number of inhabitants, the Euro is a stronger currency and that if we realise that we can play the same game on their rules and be better in it.
putting it in the perspective...
The USCG has the purchased a fleet of new HC-144s as for replacement of the HU-25s.
and EC145s (UH-72) as UH-1 replacement, (oke, building in the US)
and the Itai C-27...
that said: EADS top will be displeased and the value of shares may suffer as a result of the tanker outcome. that's bad news.
Hoera d'revolutie, 't is eindelijk zover', maar de nwe leiders blijken net zo autoritair
Re: USAF KC-46A Tanker Update
That's business.Glidepath wrote:Very well put (.......) But how can you be sure about the last?
putting it in the perspective...
The USCG has the purchased a fleet of new HC-144s as for replacement of the HU-25s.
and EC145s (UH-72) as UH-1 replacement, (oke, building in the US)
and the Itai C-27...
that said: EADS top will be displeased and the value of shares may suffer as a result of the tanker outcome. that's bad news.
Sometimes Pepsi strikes a deal, sometimes it's Coca-Cola... Nothing new under the sun.
Kees