REQ: Tristar CS-TMR op Schiphol
Moderator: gatso76
Forum rules
![]() ![]() |
-
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: 13 Mar 2006, 16:43
- Type of spotter: S3
- Subscriber Scramble: Numbercruncher
- Location: AMS/EHAM
Hela!
Bij mijn weten hangt er 1 'nieuwe' motor onder, maar vond de IVW niet dat die motor 'OK' was... Ergo: daar mag niet mee gevlogen worden. Het verhaal (want meer dan dat is het niet) vermeldt verder niet of de tweede motor die er naast ligt wel 'OK' was...
Grtz,
Robert W
Bij mijn weten hangt er 1 'nieuwe' motor onder, maar vond de IVW niet dat die motor 'OK' was... Ergo: daar mag niet mee gevlogen worden. Het verhaal (want meer dan dat is het niet) vermeldt verder niet of de tweede motor die er naast ligt wel 'OK' was...
Grtz,
Robert W
"In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move."
Douglas Adams
Douglas Adams
- Hans
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 4047
- Joined: 24 Aug 2002, 11:07
- Type of spotter: S5 - Military & Civil
- Subscriber Scramble: Yep
- Location: The Net
- Contact:
Hi,
Hopes this helps.
Regards,
Hans
Suremulins wrote:can you please translate the last posts to english...
I´m very interested with what is going on with cs-tmr!
I´ve heard that new engines will be put on at the 27th dec.
As a side note, the IVW is the Dutch Transport Inspection; http://www.ivw.nl/en/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Numbercruncher wrote:As far as I know the aircraft has one new engine, but the IVW found the engine 'not OK'. This means they are not allowed to fly with it. As far as the story goes (as it is just a story, no official statement), does not say whether the second engine, which is lying next to the aircraft, is considered 'OK' by the IVW.
Hopes this helps.
Regards,
Hans
- jfaltena
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 3005
- Joined: 09 Dec 2003, 17:08
- Type of spotter: S4
- Subscriber Scramble: jfaltena
- Location: Home or @ any Airfield
Also known as the Dutch version of the British CAA (Civil Aviation Authority), I guess...Hans wrote:As a side note, the IVW is the Dutch Transport Inspection; http://www.ivw.nl/en/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Grtz, John
- tonjochems
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 2564
- Joined: 06 Apr 2005, 12:34
- Type of spotter: civil
- Subscriber Scramble: tonjochems
- Location: Voorhout
- patrick@tediek.com
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 739
- Joined: 01 Aug 2006, 17:33
- Location: Amsterdam
- Hurricane
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: 05 Oct 2003, 18:03
- Type of spotter: F4 + H5
- Subscriber Scramble: Hurricane
- Location: EHVB
No, the cockpit is still on but there is quite some corrosion that needs to be removed / repaired. Tasks still open: refitt #3 engine, sheet metal repairs (all over the a/c), and severall electronic updates. And the Hadj indeed started last week but the TMR won't fly during this period.patrick@tediek.com wrote:Did they take the cockpit apart? What tasks are to be done on this bird? didn't start the Hadj season start last week november?when I see the cockpit structure I seriously doubt her future.
Greetingz,
Hurricane.
Groeten,
Ron
Ron
- patrick@tediek.com
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 739
- Joined: 01 Aug 2006, 17:33
- Location: Amsterdam
- cHabu
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 5527
- Joined: 22 Jan 2005, 20:49
- Subscriber Scramble: cHabu
- Location: Alkmaar / Wijchen
- Contact:
Updates are posted when available, so no need to ask......patrick@tediek.com wrote:anything happening around the aircraft? Any updates appreciated.
![Image](http://www.chickenwingscomics.com/links/cw468x60.jpg)
=> Sync your files online and across computers with Dropbox. (2GB account is free!)
Only when you can share knowledge, can you enjoy knowledge !
Report talks about a serious incident:
http://www.luchtvaartnieuws.nl/news/?id=17763" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Article also says it might/will fly for PIA.
http://www.luchtvaartnieuws.nl/news/?id=17763" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Article also says it might/will fly for PIA.
- patrick@tediek.com
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 739
- Joined: 01 Aug 2006, 17:33
- Location: Amsterdam
Interesting assumption, but: V1 is 'speed beyond which it is unsafe to abort the take off run because one runs out of runway before the aircraft has come to a complete stop'. And I seem te remember the aircraft remained on the runway during the entire incident, didn't it? So basically, the actual V1 was never overrun. (Of course, they may have calculated a different V1, but I kinda doubt that.)patrick@tediek.com wrote:It's interesting enough to conclude the pilots aborted a take off above V1 ( I assume V1 is below 140 kts with this a/c). There must be something serious to abort a take off run and to much going on to continue the take off. Has the crew ever mentioned anything about his?
== All is well, as long as we keep spinning ==
- patrick@tediek.com
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 739
- Joined: 01 Aug 2006, 17:33
- Location: Amsterdam
according to the report from IVW, the V1 was 152 kts. Captain stated that TO was aborted at "around" 140 kts.
For full IVW report :http://www.onderzoeksraad.nl/publicatie ... CS-TMR.pdf
b rdgs - Dick
=
For full IVW report :http://www.onderzoeksraad.nl/publicatie ... CS-TMR.pdf
b rdgs - Dick
=