http://www.reuters.com/article/us-germa ... SKBN1D81WRNovember 8, 2017 / 3:04 PM / a day ago
The German military needs a “fifth-generation” replacement
for its Tornado fighter jets that is hard to detect on enemy radars
and can strike targets from a great distance,
the chief of staff of the air force said on Wednesday.
Lieutenant General Karl Muellner’s comments are his clearest public statements to date
on the Tornado replacement program.
They indicate a preference for Lockheed Martin Corp’s F-35 fighter jet,
the only Western aircraft that meets those requirements.
The air force last month issued a formal request for information about the F-35,
as well as three other jets:
the F-15 and F/A-18E/F, both built by Boeing Co, and the European Eurofighter Typhoon.
Germany is kicking off the process of replacing its 85 Tornado jets, which will go out of service around 2030.
Muellner told
Germany would need to buy an off-the-shelf replacement that could enter service around 2025 to facilitate a smooth transition with the Tornado,
noting that did not leave enough time to develop a unique solution.
But he said changing warfare requirements and the need for a credible deterrent meant
the successor fighter had to be “low-observable, and able to identify and strike targets from a great distance”.
“It will have to be a fifth-generation jet to meet the full spectrum of our needs,” Muellner said.
Any new fighter jet purchase would have to be approved by parliament in the next two years
and a contract signed by 2020 or 2021 to ensure deliveries by 2025.
Muellner said he also strongly supported
a Franco-German plan to develop a successor for its fleet
of what will be 140 Eurofighter Typhoon jets,
built by Britain’s BAE Systems Plc, Italy’s Leonardo and Airbus.
The project, unveiled in July,
would help preserve critical technology skills in Europe and
allow Europe to develop its own low-observable technology, Muellner said.
Airbus last week said that choosing an interim U.S. fighter
that could eventually become a longer term commitment might interfere with the Franco-German fighter.
Industry sources said a decision to order the F-35 would be negative for Airbus,
which is part of the Eurofighter consortium and is seen as one of the key partners in the Franco-German initiative announced earlier this year.
Muellner said the German air force had also committed to NATO to provide a fleet of 14 electronic warfare aircraftby the middle of the next decade,
which meant it would likely have to buy around 20 such jets.
Possible candidates could be the Boeing EA-18 Growler,
a modified A400M transport plane that could provide stand-off jamming capability,
or a modified Eurofighter, experts said.
No decisions on that program have been made.
2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets may be replaced by F-35s.
Forum rules
![]() |
- Stratofreighter
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 22069
- Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 08:02
- Location: Netherlands
2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets may be replaced by F-35s.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-germa ... SKBN1D81WR
Last edited by Stratofreighter on 12 Dec 2017, 14:26, edited 1 time in total.
September 2024 update at FokkerNews.nl....
- Alpha Kilo One
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 4481
- Joined: 25 Apr 2005, 16:17
- Type of spotter: F5
- Subscriber Scramble: Jein 😉
Re: 2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets likely to be replaced by F-
Oh no.... What a swap. Where to put that large array of bombs on a Fail Fighter? You would only have space for a few!
"Nix bliev wie it es"
Re: 2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets likely to be replaced by F-
Whatever happened to the armed version of the EADS Baracuda, or V-3 as it could easily have been called. The cost savings alone would have made it viable. No need to hang nasties off it, just fill the nose with .... recce gear.
- jp 74
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 963
- Joined: 23 Jun 2008, 15:02
- Type of spotter: Fotografie
- Subscriber Scramble: jp 74
- Location: Den Bosch
Re: 2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets likely to be replaced by F-
depends on the mission but maybe on the external hardpoints?Alpha Kilo One wrote:Oh no.... What a swap. Where to put that large array of bombs on a Fail Fighter? You would only have space for a few!
Please explain "fail fighter" because all new fighters have there problems (yes even the F16 and F104).
I am not a F35 fan because it is not the best looking but i think this will be the best fighter ever.
Compromise is failure.
- Coati
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1551
- Joined: 25 Jun 2005, 19:53
- Type of spotter: S5
- Subscriber Scramble: No
- Location: Meppel, Netherlands
Re: 2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets likely to be replaced by F-
Bit silly to still want to cry out 'failed fighter' etc, about the best selling and performing fighter available.jp 74 wrote:depends on the mission but maybe on the external hardpoints?Alpha Kilo One wrote:Oh no.... What a swap. Where to put that large array of bombs on a Fail Fighter? You would only have space for a few!
Please explain "fail fighter" because all new fighters have there problems (yes even the F16 and F104).
I am not a F35 fan because it is not the best looking but i think this will be the best fighter ever.
Payload Tornado: 19.800 lbs. Payload F-35A 18.000 lbs
So F-35A has a slightly lower payload, but on the other hand, the missions you can perform with the F-35 are way more varied. F-35 is a multirole fighter, the Tornado IDS is solely a ground attack aircraft.
also remember the Tornado technology is very outdated, and some specific weapons turned out to be flawed (JP233).
create your own database with www.spottingmode.com
- Wildpicture
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 803
- Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 13:57
- Type of spotter: F5 Military
- Location: Flevoland
- Contact:
Re: 2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets likely to be replaced by F-
The F35 is like an over-automated electric, Tesla like 4x4, while jets like a Tornado are more like an old school Landrover Defender. Each have their own positive and negative points.Coati wrote:Bit silly to still want to cry out 'failed fighter' etc, about the best selling and performing fighter available.
Payload Tornado: 19.800 lbs. Payload F-35A 18.000 lbs
So F-35A has a slightly lower payload, but on the other hand, the missions you can perform with the F-35 are way more varied. F-35 is a multirole fighter, the Tornado IDS is solely a ground attack aircraft.
also remember the Tornado technology is very outdated, and some specific weapons turned out to be flawed (JP233).
Personally I think that the F35 will perform great in the early stages of a conflict against a high tech opponent. Later on when it becomes prolonged rough and dirty, other jets might perform as well or better. And for many tasks (Afghanistan type missions, peace time QRA etc) the F35 is just too complicated and expensive.
- Polecat
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 5048
- Joined: 12 Jul 2007, 13:58
- Type of spotter: Omnivore
- Subscriber Scramble: Polecat
- Location: The Middle East of The Netherlands
Re: 2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets likely to be replaced by F-
agree! ( ...something with ''gulf war'' and ''tornado losses'' ....Personally I think that the F35 will perform great in the early stages of a conflict against a high tech opponent. Later on when it becomes prolonged rough and dirty, other jets might perform as well or better
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Maybe some old Japanese fighter-jockey would be be willing to perform missions like the British Tornado crews did early in the first Iraqi war, but most pilots would never consider doing that in anything less advanced than an (operational) F-35...
I have never drunk milk, and I never will . . . .
- nilsko
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: 06 Sep 2002, 14:53
- Type of spotter: F2
- Subscriber Scramble: No
- Location: Doorn
Re: 2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets likely to be replaced by F-
Well, hindsight is always 20/20Polecat wrote:agree! ( ...something with ''gulf war'' and ''tornado losses'' ....Personally I think that the F35 will perform great in the early stages of a conflict against a high tech opponent. Later on when it becomes prolonged rough and dirty, other jets might perform as well or better)
Maybe some old Japanese fighter-jockey would be be willing to perform missions like the British Tornado crews did early in the first Iraqi war, but most pilots would never consider doing that in anything less advanced than an (operational) F-35...
![Wink ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
- Alpha Kilo One
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 4481
- Joined: 25 Apr 2005, 16:17
- Type of spotter: F5
- Subscriber Scramble: Jein 😉
Re: 2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets likely to be replaced by F-
A JSF with full payload is as stealthy as a Tornado with full payload, I guess.....
"Nix bliev wie it es"
Re: 2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets likely to be replaced by F-
Although you can never have enough weapons on board, with precision guided weapons you can do with less bombs than thirty years ago. The F-35 should be able to carry 8 SDB's in its bay.Alpha Kilo One wrote:Oh no.... What a swap. Where to put that large array of bombs on a Fail Fighter? You would only have space for a few!
Greetz,
Patrick
Patrick
- Coati
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1551
- Joined: 25 Jun 2005, 19:53
- Type of spotter: S5
- Subscriber Scramble: No
- Location: Meppel, Netherlands
Re: 2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets likely to be replaced by F-
Alpha Kilo One wrote:A JSF with full payload is as stealthy as a Tornado with full payload, I guess.....
This is another subject. The point is that you can take almost the same payload with an F-35A as with a Tornado IDS, as answer on your initial point
'Oh no.... What a swap. Where to put that large array of bombs on a Fail Fighter? You would only have space for a few!'
Now you bring something else to the mix: 'but, but! then it is not stealthy!' That is correct, but with a smaller payload it is stealthy, and a Tornado is not. and with or without payload, an F-35 can perform fighter jet/air supremacy tasks stealthy or not, which you cannot do with a Tornado IDS. And many more missions for which you have to use a different type of aircraft if you have Tornados, or more aircraft in a strike package.
A Tornado is based on technology from the 70s, and was build in a time that many types where bought to perform different missions. The IDS as a pure strike/interdiction aircraft (with separate variants for Air Defence, ECR). With the F-35 you can do all missions with one platform, with technology designed in this century.
create your own database with www.spottingmode.com
- Alpha Kilo One
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 4481
- Joined: 25 Apr 2005, 16:17
- Type of spotter: F5
- Subscriber Scramble: Jein 😉
Re: 2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets likely to be replaced by F-
It is not another subject, it is in the original message.
They state "low-observable"Muellner told
Germany would need to buy an off-the-shelf replacement that could enter service around 2025 to facilitate a smooth transition with the Tornado,
noting that did not leave enough time to develop a unique solution.
But he said changing warfare requirements and the need for a credible deterrent meant
the successor fighter had to be “low-observable, and able to identify and strike targets from a great distance”.
“It will have to be a fifth-generation jet to meet the full spectrum of our needs,” Muellner said.
Any new fighter jet purchase would have to be approved by parliament in the next two years
and a contract signed by 2020 or 2021 to ensure deliveries by 2025.
"Nix bliev wie it es"
- Nilson
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 4424
- Joined: 06 Sep 2002, 13:08
- Type of spotter: gooseproof
- Subscriber Scramble: Nilson
Re: 2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets likely to be replaced by F-
Coati wrote:Bit silly to still want to cry out 'failed fighter' etc, about the best selling and performing fighter available.jp 74 wrote:depends on the mission but maybe on the external hardpoints?Alpha Kilo One wrote:Oh no.... What a swap. Where to put that large array of bombs on a Fail Fighter? You would only have space for a few!
Please explain "fail fighter" because all new fighters have there problems (yes even the F16 and F104).
I am not a F35 fan because it is not the best looking but i think this will be the best fighter ever.
Best selling ok, best performing? It probably will (at least let's hope so) but can that already be said at this stage? Not that much operational right now.
life is good, but a good life is better
- Alpha Kilo One
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 4481
- Joined: 25 Apr 2005, 16:17
- Type of spotter: F5
- Subscriber Scramble: Jein 😉
Re: 2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets likely to be replaced by F-
My question: Best performing in what? As a fighter, as a bomber, as Intel-platform?
If you want to stay positive, it is hopefully a good compromise.
Future will tell.
For me, while "we" can only afford 35 pieces, it will never be a winner.
You should never put all eggs in one basket.
If you want to stay positive, it is hopefully a good compromise.
Future will tell.
For me, while "we" can only afford 35 pieces, it will never be a winner.
You should never put all eggs in one basket.
"Nix bliev wie it es"
- K-9
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1575
- Joined: 04 Oct 2004, 16:49
- Type of spotter: military
- Location: Leiderdorp
Re: 2030: Luftwaffe Tornado jets likely to be replaced by F-
And in the meantime; enjoy the tonkas while we can...