schiphol 31-03 MIL
Forum rules
This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
- FALCONCREST
- Scramble Senior
- Posts: 429
- Joined: 23 Mar 2003, 14:29
- Location: EHVB
- Contact:
schiphol 31-03 MIL
Hi
Some quick and dirty results from this morning :
njoy
JOHAN
http://WWW.DAPHO.NL" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Some quick and dirty results from this morning :
njoy
JOHAN
http://WWW.DAPHO.NL" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Last edited by FALCONCREST on 31 Mar 2009, 11:43, edited 1 time in total.
JOHAN B
http://WWW.DAPHO.NL
http://WWW.DAPHO.NL
- jimmy van drunen
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 6511
- Joined: 23 Dec 2006, 22:32
- Type of spotter: Photographer
- Location: Tilburg, near EHGR RWY28
- Flyingdutchman
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 820
- Joined: 05 Sep 2002, 22:38
- Location: Doorn
- Contact:
Re: schiphol 31-03 MIL
Nice to see that they've come to Schiphol! The weather conditions looks good.
You might want to check your sharpening in PS, it looks like you've done it a bit too much. Look at the line at the nose of the USAF Gulfstream in the last picture, it's kinda rigged.
Evert
You might want to check your sharpening in PS, it looks like you've done it a bit too much. Look at the line at the nose of the USAF Gulfstream in the last picture, it's kinda rigged.
Evert
- FALCONCREST
- Scramble Senior
- Posts: 429
- Joined: 23 Mar 2003, 14:29
- Location: EHVB
- Contact:
Re: schiphol 31-03 MIL
I wacked them trough photoshop; Thats what I call quick and dirty!You might want to check your sharpening in PS, it looks like you've done it a bit too much. Look at the line at the nose of the USAF Gulfstream in the last picture, it's kinda rigged.
When I've got time, a gonna take more effort in getting them properly done.
Just wanna share this mornings pics...
Cu
Johan
JOHAN B
http://WWW.DAPHO.NL
http://WWW.DAPHO.NL
- dirty devil
- Scramble Newbie
- Posts: 42
- Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 13:26
- Type of spotter: militair
- Subscriber Scramble: ja
- Location: Houten
- Contact:
Re: schiphol 31-03 MIL
Nice Pictures !!!
Otto Kooijman
Visit my website at:http://www.ottokooijmanaviation.nl
Visit my website at:http://www.ottokooijmanaviation.nl
- EHVBspotter
- Scramble Junior
- Posts: 221
- Joined: 02 May 2003, 21:32
- Type of spotter: F2
- Location: Rijnsburg
- Contact:
Re: schiphol 31-03 MIL
I have tried to make some pictures of the other two the IL-96 and the C-32.
Made with a Kenko 1,5x and 100-400.
Made with a Kenko 1,5x and 100-400.
- Key
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11249
- Joined: 06 Dec 2002, 09:21
- Type of spotter: F2
- Subscriber Scramble: U bet
- Location: ex EHAM
Re: schiphol 31-03 MIL
Seems to me the 'secret tip' from Evert is that less sharpening is not more work but looks better. IMHO that is the only thing that needs adjustment for photos of this size and use, meaning quick and dirty would be really all you need if you do it slightly different.FALCONCREST wrote:Thats what I call quick and dirty!
Great lighting, thanks for sharing!
Erik
What four words, Jimmy!?!
- FALCONCREST
- Scramble Senior
- Posts: 429
- Joined: 23 Mar 2003, 14:29
- Location: EHVB
- Contact:
Re: schiphol 31-03 MIL
Hi Evert en Erik
Actually, I've noticed the nose is out of focus... !
The lens (Canon 70-200 2.8L ) was set at 2.8 @130mm
so, its not the sharpening, but the out of focus which causes the rigged nose is my guess..
Johan
http://WWW.DAPHO.NL" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Is this one better ?
Actually, I've noticed the nose is out of focus... !
The lens (Canon 70-200 2.8L ) was set at 2.8 @130mm
so, its not the sharpening, but the out of focus which causes the rigged nose is my guess..
Johan
http://WWW.DAPHO.NL" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Is this one better ?
JOHAN B
http://WWW.DAPHO.NL
http://WWW.DAPHO.NL
Re: schiphol 31-03 MIL
Here is my small impression of two days:
First time I used my one pod for a night shot, I am happy with the result.
The other participants could only be taken under ==censored== situations this afternoon (backlight, shade or stairs in the front), so this is all folks.
regards, Maarten
First time I used my one pod for a night shot, I am happy with the result.
The other participants could only be taken under ==censored== situations this afternoon (backlight, shade or stairs in the front), so this is all folks.
regards, Maarten
- Boudewijn van Oirschot
- Scramble Master
- Posts: 2746
- Joined: 16 Feb 2007, 18:16
- Type of spotter: Wat niet?
- Subscriber Scramble: Boudewijn van Oirschot
- Location: Tilburg, NB
Re: schiphol 31-03 MIL
Some nice visitors over there! But i expected a lot of more exotic when you take a look to the list of participating countries
- Key
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11249
- Joined: 06 Dec 2002, 09:21
- Type of spotter: F2
- Subscriber Scramble: U bet
- Location: ex EHAM
Re: schiphol 31-03 MIL
Hi Johan,
However, your second C-37 version is indeed better than the first I think! Main reason for my reaction was that I think your shots can turn out very well with very little 'Shopping'.
Erik
Not exactly what I meant. You got some 'halos' and some 'jaggies', both signs of oversharpening (possibly combined with Shadow/Highlight Tool). Look at the Greek Gulf for instance: halos best visible around the main gear, jaggies in leading edges, roundel and regi (the cheatlines are a different story, near-horizontal lines get distorted at this resolution anyway).FALCONCREST wrote:Actually, I've noticed the nose is out of focus... !
However, your second C-37 version is indeed better than the first I think! Main reason for my reaction was that I think your shots can turn out very well with very little 'Shopping'.
Erik
What four words, Jimmy!?!
- planespotters.nl
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1048
- Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 19:30
- Type of spotter: Military and F5+
- Location: Near EHVB
- Contact:
Re: schiphol 31-03 MIL
The C-32 from this evening departed around 20.00 here is a picture of her:
More wil follow!
Kind Regards Sander
More wil follow!
Kind Regards Sander
Canon EOS 30D
Canon EF-S 18-55mm F 3.5-5.6
Canon EF 70-200 F4.0 L IS USM (New!)
Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II
Canon EF-S 18-55mm F 3.5-5.6
Canon EF 70-200 F4.0 L IS USM (New!)
Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II
- Ghanz
- Scramble Die-Hard
- Posts: 649
- Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 21:36
- Type of spotter: F5
- Subscriber Scramble: Ghanz
- Contact:
Re: schiphol 31-03 MIL
One of mine of the C-32 departing in the last rays of the sun of this evening:
Moved to Phototopic AMS/EHAM 31-03-09, to combine it with other shots I made.
Greetz,
Hans.
Moved to Phototopic AMS/EHAM 31-03-09, to combine it with other shots I made.
Greetz,
Hans.
Last edited by Ghanz on 03 Apr 2009, 20:00, edited 1 time in total.
- dinovandoorn
- Scramble Addict
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: 20 Jun 2006, 09:31
- Subscriber Scramble: dinovandoorn
- Contact: