RAF Vulcan experts-req for unit ID

ImageDedicated forum to share your own recent photos with the rest of the community.
Please note large files may exist here before you start browsing!

Forum rules
ImageThis is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum.
Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post.
In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.).

Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so.
Post Reply
tomh
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 338
Joined: 22 Jul 2003, 17:27
Location: Vermont USA
Contact:

RAF Vulcan experts-req for unit ID

Post by tomh »

I'm hoping Scramble has a Vulcan expert who can help me positively identify the following three insignias

The first one below was on a Vulcan B.1 photographed in 1960
Image


This next two were on Vulcans in the mid-1970s
Image


Image


Thanks-Tomh
Hans Rolink
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1568
Joined: 07 Sep 2002, 22:53
Type of spotter: F4.5
Subscriber Scramble: Hans Rolink
Location: The North of the Netherlands
Contact:

Re: RAF Vulcan experts-req for unit ID

Post by Hans Rolink »

Tom,

in general, the red cross on the white shield signified the City of Lincoln. It could be found on Vulcans from most squadrons. Both final Vulcan bases RAF Scampton and RAF Waddington were near that city.
The center badge is from No. 230 Operational Conversion Unit which trained Vulcan crews.

Hope this helps.

Hans.
Dude
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 145
Joined: 21 Jun 2009, 11:59
Type of spotter: F5

Re: RAF Vulcan experts-req for unit ID

Post by Dude »

Hans Rolink wrote:Tom,

in general, the red cross on the white shield signified the City of Lincoln. It could be found on Vulcans from most squadrons. Both final Vulcan bases RAF Scampton and RAF Waddington were near that city.
The center badge is from No. 230 Operational Conversion Unit which trained Vulcan crews.

Hope this helps.

Hans.
Damn Hans you get smarter by the day :wink: :wink:
Met vriendelijk groeten, Dude

Sony A350 met AF28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro
Hans Rolink
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1568
Joined: 07 Sep 2002, 22:53
Type of spotter: F4.5
Subscriber Scramble: Hans Rolink
Location: The North of the Netherlands
Contact:

Re: RAF Vulcan experts-req for unit ID

Post by Hans Rolink »

Dude wrote:
Damn Hans you get smarter by the day :wink: :wink:
Always had a soft spot for anything British. :D

Hans.
User avatar
Stephan Lodewijks
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 5058
Joined: 13 Jun 2005, 12:54
Type of spotter: I shall say this only once: (ex-)MILITARY!!!! :-)
Subscriber Scramble: Stephan Lodewijks
Location: Eindhoven

Re: RAF Vulcan experts-req for unit ID

Post by Stephan Lodewijks »

Hans Rolink wrote:Always had a soft spot for anything British.
...ummm.....Margareth Thatcher?????

Respect man, your one of a kind!! :wink:
User avatar
P.Terlouw
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 943
Joined: 12 Aug 2006, 11:22
Subscriber Scramble: P.Terlouw
Location: Soesterberg
Contact:

Re: RAF Vulcan experts-req for unit ID

Post by P.Terlouw »

first and last badge is of the Waddington Wing which represents the City of Lincoln crest. In the early days it sometimes had a light blue background.

the second badge is from no.230 OCU based at RAF Waddington (1956-1969) and then to RAF Scampton (1969-1981)
Hans Rolink
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1568
Joined: 07 Sep 2002, 22:53
Type of spotter: F4.5
Subscriber Scramble: Hans Rolink
Location: The North of the Netherlands
Contact:

Re: RAF Vulcan experts-req for unit ID

Post by Hans Rolink »

Stephan Lodewijks wrote:
Hans Rolink wrote:Always had a soft spot for anything British.
...ummm.....Margareth Thatcher?????

Respect man, your one of a kind!! :wink:
Well, she did rid Blighty of Arthur Scargill!
And one of a kind I sure hope to be 8)

Hans.
SPERX
Scramble Newbie
Scramble Newbie
Posts: 27
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 17:31
Subscriber Scramble: SPERX
Location: Church Fenton, UK

Re: RAF Vulcan experts-req for unit ID

Post by SPERX »

"" Well, she did rid Blighty of Arthur Scargill!
And one of a kind I sure hope to be

Hans. ""

Along with the coal mining industry; heavy engineering; most manufacturing industry; decent social housing; much of the Royal Navy just before the Falklands War; a significant chunk of the RAF including the Vulcans the last few of which had to be patched up using parts recovered from museum aircraft around the world for service in her fortuitous Falklands War. The RAF Phantoms were withdrawn from service early whlst they still had plenty of airframe life available and before Tornado F3 was fully operational. Likewise the Buccaneers were withdrawn long before it was necessary.

Recently published documents also suggest that she opposed the re-unification of Germany on the grounds that she feared an over-powerful reunified Germany rather more than she feared the Soviet Union. Interesting double standards for someone who liked to be seen as a champion of individual freedom.

And what did she introduce? Oh yes, over-reliance on the Financial Services sector - and just look where that got us.
Hans Rolink
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1568
Joined: 07 Sep 2002, 22:53
Type of spotter: F4.5
Subscriber Scramble: Hans Rolink
Location: The North of the Netherlands
Contact:

Re: RAF Vulcan experts-req for unit ID

Post by Hans Rolink »

SPERX wrote:"" Well, she did rid Blighty of Arthur Scargill!
And one of a kind I sure hope to be

Hans. ""

Along with the coal mining industry; heavy engineering; most manufacturing industry; decent social housing; much of the Royal Navy just before the Falklands War; a significant chunk of the RAF including the Vulcans the last few of which had to be patched up using parts recovered from museum aircraft around the world for service in her fortuitous Falklands War. The RAF Phantoms were withdrawn from service early whlst they still had plenty of airframe life available and before Tornado F3 was fully operational. Likewise the Buccaneers were withdrawn long before it was necessary.

Recently published documents also suggest that she opposed the re-unification of Germany on the grounds that she feared an over-powerful reunified Germany rather more than she feared the Soviet Union. Interesting double standards for someone who liked to be seen as a champion of individual freedom.

And what did she introduce? Oh yes, over-reliance on the Financial Services sector - and just look where that got us.
You´re right, there´s another side to every coin. What I was referring to was the chaos in the winter of 1978-79.

:ontopic:

Hans.
tomh
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 338
Joined: 22 Jul 2003, 17:27
Location: Vermont USA
Contact:

Re: RAF Vulcan experts-req for unit ID

Post by tomh »

Thanks all for the replies. OK then, well, I see I should have jumped in with a "thank you" before the Maggie critique got rolling. So, with the City of Lincoln badge, was it on both sides of the tailfin, or should I check my negs to see what the opposite side tailfin might show to determine the squadron of assignment?

Sentimental Phantom attachment aside, I've always wondered just what the max Mach on the British Phantoms was with those fat Speys side by side. From what I've heard it takes most any Phantom quite a while to approach Mach II. I recall a couple of sweaty Phantom jocks coming out of ops during a big exercise with one exclaiming to the other, "Damn those F111s, you just can't catch them when they're on the deck like that". But I suppose the Bucaneer was capable of bringing about much the same exasperation from the fighter drivers.
SPERX
Scramble Newbie
Scramble Newbie
Posts: 27
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 17:31
Subscriber Scramble: SPERX
Location: Church Fenton, UK

Re: RAF Vulcan experts-req for unit ID

Post by SPERX »

tomh wrote:Thanks all for the replies. OK then, well, I see I should have jumped in with a "thank you" before the Maggie critique got rolling. So, with the City of Lincoln badge, was it on both sides of the tailfin, or should I check my negs to see what the opposite side tailfin might show to determine the squadron of assignment?

Sentimental Phantom attachment aside, I've always wondered just what the max Mach on the British Phantoms was with those fat Speys side by side. From what I've heard it takes most any Phantom quite a while to approach Mach II. I recall a couple of sweaty Phantom jocks coming out of ops during a big exercise with one exclaiming to the other, "Damn those F111s, you just can't catch them when they're on the deck like that". But I suppose the Bucaneer was capable of bringing about much the same exasperation from the fighter drivers.
I d/k what the figures are but I read somewhere that the Spey powered F4s were slower than the P&W powered ones because their demand for air meant that the UK versions had wider intakes and that in turn messed up the area ruling. In another book somewhere in my library a Bucc pilot describes how they could run away from most A/D fighters at low level. Interestingly both the UK F4s and the Buccs had Spey engines, albeit with reheat added to the F4 engines. Blackburn must have got the aerodynamics spot on if you compare the performance.

As for the F111s, well back in about 1991 I was VERY LUCKY and got a trip in one from Upper Heyford. Part of the demonstration out over the North Sea was the "combat escape manoevre" - starting at FL170 and 420 KIAS we simultaneously rolled inverted; swept the wings; plugged in the burners and pulled nose down and presto 1.2M within about 15 seconds and a big boom over the oil rigs below! Happy Days........
tomh
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 338
Joined: 22 Jul 2003, 17:27
Location: Vermont USA
Contact:

Re: RAF Vulcan experts-req for unit ID

Post by tomh »

the UK versions had wider intakes and that in turn messed up the area ruling
Exactly, SPERX. The only way they could have retained the desired airflow
characteristics would have been to lengthen the aircraft about 6 feet, and that wasn't gonna happen. The Bucc as we know, we designed with what appeared to exaggerated area rule, and wasn't supersonic on the level. I don't know if they missed the mark in top speed, or if that area-ruled fuselage resulted in high subsonic mach cruise with low fuel burn benefit. Always an interesting aircraft, and another of the many from the other side of the pond that I have never seen.

starting at FL170 and 420 KIAS we simultaneously rolled inverted; swept the wings; plugged in the burners and pulled nose down and presto 1.2M within about 15 seconds
Oh yeah, you got me pinned to my office chair with that description!

Slightly-related prediction-When USAF gets around to replacing the T-38, it will be with a subsonic aircraft.
Post Reply

Return to “Aviation Photo Forum”