Thanks Robert! More to come!Numbercruncher wrote:Wow, very impressive hardware there, thanks for sharing!
Grtz,
Robert W
Thanks! Yeah, I guess that is due to the compression. Like you said, if the link is clicked the full picture is shown.BlackBird wrote:Nice! Those Belarus MI's are seldom seen
Due to compression (I guess) the pics seem to be out of focus (unsharp).
Advise to other viewers: by clicking on the pictures you will follow a link to imgbb resulting in a HR version of that picture.
The Su24s would have been worth it!patrick dirksen wrote:Heard rumours of somebody being taken away by security.
Well, we got approached by security after 8 hours, but their concern was that they said we were standing too close to the air base itself. However, what makes this tricky is, the base does not have a fence.patrick dirksen wrote:Nice shots indeed! All taken from outside the fence I presume? No problems with security? Heard rumours of somebody being taken away by security.
Thanks Ian, these cns seem plausible for Mi-24RCh variants and fit in known ranges, but I would rather like the c/ns being confirmed 100%.Ian French wrote:From the photos the hind c/ns look like 3534623912936 for 46 and 3534623912942 for 47. 47 is further away in the photo so the c/n is much harder to read. Pretty sure it ends 942 but the preceding 4 digits may not be correct.
Hi! I got the same answer from what I could see it is that c/ns!Ecm wrote:Thanks Ian, these cns seem plausible for Mi-24RCh variants and fit in known ranges, but I would rather like the c/ns being confirmed 100%.Ian French wrote:From the photos the hind c/ns look like 3534623912936 for 46 and 3534623912942 for 47. 47 is further away in the photo so the c/n is much harder to read. Pretty sure it ends 942 but the preceding 4 digits may not be correct.
Johan, could you shine a light on this please? MTIA.
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more