Farewell KC-10

ImageDedicated forum to share your own recent photos with the rest of the community.
Please note large files may exist here before you start browsing!

Forum rules
ImageThis is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum.
Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post.
In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.).

Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so.
Post Reply
Recceview
Posts: 4
Joined: 22 Nov 2023, 17:05

Farewell KC-10

Post by Recceview »

Farewell KC-10

At the end of the afternoon an USAF KC-10A landed at Ramstein Air Base for the very last time.
The worldwide farewell tour of this KC-10 started at the beginning of this week in New Zealand.

Image84-0191 KC-10A 60AMW Rch232 Farewell KC-10 Ramstein 20-1-2024
User avatar
Alpha Kilo One
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 4499
Joined: 25 Apr 2005, 16:17
Type of spotter: F5
Subscriber Scramble: Jein 😉

Re: Farewell KC-10

Post by Alpha Kilo One »

Sad...... I like the sound of these triholers.
Why do they stop flying, while there older friends (KC-135) still soldier on?
They are more modern?
Easier to fly, easier to maintain? Cheaper to fly maybe?
"Nix bliev wie it es"
User avatar
Sjoerd
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 2005
Joined: 26 Nov 2002, 16:46
Location: underneath the AMC route

Re: Farewell KC-10

Post by Sjoerd »

One of the explanations I received was that, although the KC-10 frames are younger, most airframes have flown more hours then the average 135's. The KC-10 fleet was much smaller, putting the frames to much more flying hours as the KC-10's supported pretty much every overseas fighter deployments due to it bigger fuel load.
-Good intell, allows for good decision making!-
User avatar
ErwinS
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 2149
Joined: 09 Mar 2005, 12:34
Subscriber Scramble: ErwinS

Re: Farewell KC-10

Post by ErwinS »

Not easier to mantain. More expensive and parts where a bigger problem then with the KC-135.
User avatar
Le Addeur noir
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 65739
Joined: 19 Jan 2007, 16:22
Subscriber Scramble: Nee
Location: Asie

Re: Farewell KC-10

Post by Le Addeur noir »

The KC-10 fleet also was less reliable than the KC-135 fleet. The KC-10s ofter went u/s at the wrong juncture. That's why a lot of deployments suffered delays.
Drink treble
See double
Act single

and the Emir called up his jet fighters
User avatar
Alpha Kilo One
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 4499
Joined: 25 Apr 2005, 16:17
Type of spotter: F5
Subscriber Scramble: Jein 😉

Re: Farewell KC-10

Post by Alpha Kilo One »

Thanks for all updates!
Still like this plane.
Seen my last one at Mildenhall end of September then :byebye:
"Nix bliev wie it es"
User avatar
Key
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11259
Joined: 06 Dec 2002, 09:21
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: U bet
Location: ex EHAM

Re: Farewell KC-10

Post by Key »

Indeed sad to see them go. Thanks for the very fitting image!

Erik
Climb to 20ft, we're leaving a dust trail
Post Reply

Return to “Aviation Photo Forum”