Thijs wrote:Totally agree with you. But what i want to know, which scanner did all of you use? the pictures shown here are of good quality, and the type of scanner is part of it. Next to some experience with PS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77a60/77a60d9b6ddafea2c68c58126bb1a4203ad10282" alt="Wink :wink:"
It depends on several other factors aswell, such as the quality of the analog camera + lens which was used, the quality of the film which was used. Because there is a big difference between Hema/Dixons own brand and Afga slides or even better Kodachrome 64 or Fuji Sensia 100 for example.
And last but not the least the state that the slides are in currently, has also alot to do with the way it was stored (dust, fingerprintmarks, scratches, discolouration, etc.) and aswell again the originaly film quality/brand of course.
If all of the above are "state of the art" then I would recommend an expensive and "state of the art" scanner aswell... otherwise it's of no use... and more or less just "een vlag op een modderschuit" as we would call it in Dutch.