This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
IMHO the Photography forum is not meant to keep the updates editor happy, better post a log for that. Anyway them Italians don't know how to be selective, and I think that's boring. (Overgeneralizing? Maybe, but it seems that all the Italian posters here do it.)Polecat wrote:It's a nice rundown of all aircraft in use, ideal for the Scramble updates editor!
Sorry guy but your generalization is boring.... PLS have a look at how many post I made for example and how many pics for each one, or Mastejet or zetamimmo did....marcel32us wrote: IMHO the Photography forum is not meant to keep the updates editor happy, better post a log for that. Anyway them Italians don't know how to be selective, and I think that's boring. (Overgeneralizing? Maybe, but it seems that all the Italian posters here do it.)
Hey, I apolagized for overgeneralisation on forehand, and indeed your posts are always quite usefull and when pictures involved they're selected and very nice. Can I only have an opinion when it's positive?tonno1970 wrote:Sorry guy but your generalization is boring.... PLS have a look at how many post I made for example and how many pics for each one, or Mastejet or zetamimmo did....marcel32us wrote: IMHO the Photography forum is not meant to keep the updates editor happy, better post a log for that. Anyway them Italians don't know how to be selective, and I think that's boring. (Overgeneralizing? Maybe, but it seems that all the Italian posters here do it.)
Moreover zerotto put on the title it was a big post and it could'nt be more selective than this... He put only one pics for any F16.... Its intention was different. It's a sin you didn't cought it.
Perhaps you could avoid the italian posts next time....
gp
If you refer to the note "LARGE POST" this was an addition done by the moderators, to warn people for the large amount of picturestonno1970 wrote:
Moreover zerotto put on the title it was a big post and it could'nt be more selective than this...
No, Av tail code 2008, 31th FW 50 viper from Aviano.... it was enough....I think, to understand what he was going to do.Thijs wrote:If you refer to the note "LARGE POST" this was an addition done by the moderators, to warn people for the large amount of picturestonno1970 wrote:
Moreover zerotto put on the title it was a big post and it could'nt be more selective than this...
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more