USAF still stuck with two Airbus A330 KC-45 tankers...

ImageForum for news and discussions on miltary aviation matters.

Forum rules
Image
Post Reply
User avatar
Stratofreighter
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 22192
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 08:02
Location: Netherlands

USAF still stuck with two Airbus A330 KC-45 tankers...

Post by Stratofreighter »

http://cmsimg.defensenews.com/apps/pbcs ... -Unsettled
Image

http://www.defensenews.com/article/2012 ... /302280001
Scrapped Northrop-EADS Tanker Deal Still Unsettled

Feb. 28, 2012 - 09:05AM |

On Feb. 29, 2008 — four years ago this week — the U.S. Air Force selected a Northrop Grumman-EADS team to build its next-generation tanker after a heated, multiyear battle with Boeing for the $35 billion contract.

The companies immediately began working on a $1.5 billion development contract that included four test aircraft, which were to be based on the commercial Airbus A330 airframe and given the designation KC-45.

But the contract was short-lived.

A mere 11 days after the contract was awarded, Boeing contested it. Months later, then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates canceled the competition and told the Air Force to start from square one.
When it did, Boeing prevailed.

What few people know is that the Air Force still partly owns two of the four Airbus A330 airframes that were produced as part of the original contract.

Four years later, the Air Force still has not settled termination-fee negotiations with Northrop and EADS.

One aircraft is in storage at the Airbus Military facility in Getafe, Spain.
Another is in Toulouse, France — home to Airbus’ A330 production line, according to James Darcy, a spokesman for EADS North America.

Pictures of the aircraft in Toulouse have popped up on plane-spotter websites in the past few years.

Photos from 2010 show a gray jetliner, with protective plastic wrapped around its landing gear and tape sealing its doorjambs.

Its wings are engineless. The cockpit windows are covered in plastic.
The remnants of a temporary registration number — taped beside the left rear cabin door — still feature the plane’s production number, 925.

The plane, which was once powered by two General Electric engines, flew for the first time April 18, 2008, according to aircraft tracking websites.

The two additional aircraft that were part of the original development contract were still in the early stages of production when the program was canceled and have since been diverted to other customers, according to an industry source.

“We and prime contractor Northrop Grumman remain in discussions with the Air Force as we work toward a fair and appropriate settlement of the termination for convenience,” Darcy said of the talks.

Northrop Grumman spokesman Randy Belote declined to comment on the termination negotiations and referred questions to the Air Force.

Air Force officials said they expect the contract termination issues to be settled soon.

When the Northrop-EADS team was selected in 2008, they had planned to build components of the tankers at existing production facilities in Europe and assemble the plane at a new plant in Mobile, Ala.
November 2024 update at FokkerNews.nl....
User avatar
Piet Luijken
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3954
Joined: 27 Dec 2003, 14:19
Subscriber Scramble: Piet Luijken
Location: Amstelveen

Re: USAF still stuck with two Airbus A330 KC-45 tankers...

Post by Piet Luijken »

According KLM thread at t Praethuis, 925 is sold to KLM.

Did it had a usaf regi already?

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Greetings,

Piet Luijken
Scramble Editor
M582
Posts: 1
Joined: 05 Mar 2012, 21:10

Re: USAF still stuck with two Airbus A330 KC-45 tankers...

Post by M582 »

KLM has c/n's: 682, 686, 703, 738, 770, 801, 811, 819, 834, 900, 1161 for their A330-200's.
925 is one of two KC-45's for USAF. No USAF serial was ever applied.
User avatar
Piet Luijken
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3954
Joined: 27 Dec 2003, 14:19
Subscriber Scramble: Piet Luijken
Location: Amstelveen

Re: USAF still stuck with two Airbus A330 KC-45 tankers...

Post by Piet Luijken »

that is too bad!
would be cool to fly an aircraft with an usaf serial :-)
Greetings,

Piet Luijken
Scramble Editor
Post Reply

Return to “Military Aviation News”