SP active

ImagePost your military communication topics here.

Moderator: joost

Forum rules
Image
Post Reply
joost
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3303
Joined: 10 Jan 2003, 20:09
Location: Grave
Contact:

SP active

Post by joost »

BOAR 1-2 : 397.275 / <142.800> to Vliehors

GUNMAN 1/3-4 : 278.350 -> 278.475 -> 375.700 / <141.125>

further, <143.475> <138.025> active which indicates 480FS also in the air

indeed :

WARHAWK 1-2 : 362.825 also active (working Galley)
TONKACRAZIE22

Re: SP active

Post by TONKACRAZIE22 »

Great comms they were joost i hope, to catch them again mate. thanks for the freqs info.
Can somebody help me with all the serials i only got Boar02 which was A10 81-0980 :D
User avatar
RobertMB
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 920
Joined: 28 Aug 2004, 12:44
Subscriber Scramble: RobertMB
Location: Groningen

Re: SP active

Post by RobertMB »

Boar01: A10C 81-0956
User avatar
CRUISECONTROL
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 425
Joined: 28 Jul 2006, 22:18
Subscriber Scramble: yes
Contact:

Re: SP active

Post by CRUISECONTROL »

RobertMB wrote:Boar01: A10C 81-0956
FYI,
Pilot "BOAR401" report tails;
(82-0)654 and the (82-0)650
The best place to be: Cornfield-range
TONKACRAZIE22

Re: SP active

Post by TONKACRAZIE22 »

CRUISECONTROL wrote:
RobertMB wrote:Boar01: A10C 81-0956
FYI,
Pilot "BOAR401" report tails;
(82-0)654 and the (82-0)650

strange when i heard him crystal clear aswell i also had the same info from about 7 websites showing the same tail i posted.!!
joost
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3303
Joined: 10 Jan 2003, 20:09
Location: Grave
Contact:

Re: SP active

Post by joost »

TONKACRAZIE22 wrote:
CRUISECONTROL wrote:
RobertMB wrote:Boar01: A10C 81-0956
FYI,
Pilot "BOAR401" report tails;
(82-0)654 and the (82-0)650

strange when i heard him crystal clear aswell i also had the same info from about 7 websites showing the same tail i posted.!!
I personnaly never put a tail against hexcode for USAF & German AF jets (except F-4's) ...Same with Lakenheath eagles, they have shown more Hexcodes then total amount of F-15 present at Lakenheath so I don't bother to tie them up. Even more, sometimes a hexcode was shown as a F-15, day after it was in use by a F-16 or A-10 out of Spangdahlem. So in all honousty, tails shown on web sites could be right at some times, but can not be trusted fully.

I asume Cruisecontrol had another source confirming these tails, however Personally I am still relluctant to tie these serials with Hexcodes shown. For reasons stated above

Grtz
Joost
User avatar
CRUISECONTROL
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 425
Joined: 28 Jul 2006, 22:18
Subscriber Scramble: yes
Contact:

Re: SP active

Post by CRUISECONTROL »

joost wrote:[
I personnaly never put a tail against hexcode for USAF & German AF jets (except F-4's) ...Same with Lakenheath eagles, they have shown more Hexcodes then total amount of F-15 present at Lakenheath so I don't bother to tie them up. Even more, sometimes a hexcode was shown as a F-15, day after it was in use by a F-16 or A-10 out of Spangdahlem. So in all honousty, tails shown on web sites could be right at some times, but can not be trusted fully.

I asume Cruisecontrol had another source confirming these tails, however Personally I am still relluctant to tie these serials with Hexcodes shown. For reasons stated above

Grtz
Joost
Pilot report on 279.000
The best place to be: Cornfield-range
TONKACRAZIE22

Re: SP active

Post by TONKACRAZIE22 »

thats what i heard him on too. well fair enough mate.
Post Reply

Return to “Radio Activity”