Mode S / SBS and radio logs, airfield specific, are allowed, but always state your source, mode S / SBS or air traffic conversations. These logs can be placed in the "day topic" so a separate Mode S / SBS radio log is not necessary |
. |
/O\
\_______[|(.)|]_______/
o ++ O ++ o
09-9210 62ndAWGerard wrote:I would be happy to read which C-17 landed at around 14.40lt, just when I entered to highway back home.
Gerard
Tommy,TommyW wrote:Gerard wrote:Main goal for my visit was the presence of the Afghan C-27s, which were all seen parked on the east-platform:
04095
84020
84025
84026
Hi Gerard,
does "east-platform" mean the usual RS-Herc-ramp, which can well be overlooked from the 26/27-approach spotting point?
Regards
Tommy
Oh yes they are. You can easily see them next in line from the east side of the base (landing). At the Kindsbach hill you have a tail-on view.TommyW wrote:Many thanks Jeroen.
So they are not really visible from "runway-level".
Tommy
Are they still in this weekend?TommyW wrote:Gerard wrote:Main goal for my visit was the presence of the Afghan C-27s, which were all seen parked on the east-platform:
04095
84020
84025
84026
Hi Gerard,
does "east-platform" mean the usual RS-Herc-ramp, which can well be overlooked from the 26/27-approach spotting point?
Regards
Tommy
Thanks, but just to make sure..... according to a post on Flugzeugforum this was present and departed on the 29th. I am talking about the one that arrived around 14.40lt.Miles wrote:09-9210 62ndAWGerard wrote:I would be happy to read which C-17 landed at around 14.40lt, just when I entered to highway back home.
. |
/O\
\_______[|(.)|]_______/
o ++ O ++ o
I dont check cn4095 yet.....Starfighter_F-104G wrote:>Main goal for my visit was the presence of the Afghan C-27s, which were all seen parked on the >east-platform:
>04095
>84020
>84025
>84026
I have 84095 not 04095
Thery aren't Afghan AF , only USAF accepted and now stored at ETAR pending future decision
Well, then check again! We all make mistakes, so do youStarfighter_F-104G wrote:I have 84095 not 04095
I said Afghan, not Afghan AF, that was meant to be a subtle difference! As a matter of fact they are DoD accepted, not even USAF.Starfighter_F-104G wrote:Thery aren't Afghan AF , only USAF accepted and now stored at ETAR pending future decision
. |
/O\
\_______[|(.)|]_______/
o ++ O ++ o
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more