Looking at what remains of the tail boom, I'd rather say Mi-171Sh.ehusmann wrote: ↑05 Mar 2022, 16:01 Another Su-34 down (tweet mentions Su-25, but in one of the comments it is proven to be a Su-34). At least one of the pilots was killed.
https://twitter.com/Militarylandnet/sta ... h5K9WVZXeg
And also another Hind:
https://twitter.com/GirkinGirkin/status ... xHN6KYpGwA
So that already makes at least 2x Hind, 2x Su-34 and one Su-30 and possibly another (based on the video of the pilots).
They are navy pilots and they wear survival suits. They probably calculate their risks and probabilities which are having to eject over land or over the sea.orange wrote: ↑05 Mar 2022, 20:46 The crew of the Russian Su-30 ejected and then tried to escape wearing bright orange flightsuits! What are they thinking; they are on a trainingflight?
https://twitter.com/girkingirkin/status ... 01760?s=21
The lack of any trees (there are quite a few in the first crash) and the lack of fire damage (whereas the first one goes down in a ball of fire) makes me think that there were two Mi-24/Mi-35s lost today.
De Verrekieker wrote: ↑05 Mar 2022, 19:25 The burned wreckage besides the Mi-24 picture looks more like a Mi-8AMTSh. Look at the tailboom. Serial begins with RF-91...
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more