You've been burying the lede for 3 reports now, man! Time to get to the good stuff!!!patrick dirksen wrote: ↑26 Jan 2023, 22:15
...about halfway the low flying area we woud visit tomorrow...
[
Possibly for spares use? I remember seeing a photo of the D-model without ejection seats.patrick dirksen wrote: ↑26 Jan 2023, 22:15 -F/A-18s 163993 and 164058 were seen near the NASA area. Have these been transferred (and got a NASA registration) or are these just stored as I saw mentioned somewhere, maybe for future use by NASA?
Hahaha! That shows again we all have our preferences. If you really are into low flying areas, this would be an interesting spot I guess. PM me if you need more info.SBGrad wrote: ↑28 Jan 2023, 00:40 For me, the ultimate spotting catch are airborne aircraft in the wild. The Jedi Transition was great, but not available for photos these last couple years.
However, there have been stories told by fence lines of new places to shoot different sections of the Sidewinder low level route. However, the new pioneers are very jealous of their find and details are far and few between.
Then you go and tell of a low level shoot and naturally my heart rate went up ( since I haven't found a replacement for Jedi yet!). If I were writing these reports I would've had one report on the low level action and ignored the museum/gate guard aircraft.
In any event, many thanks for your thoroughness.
Thanks. Indeed the D doesn't have ejection seats anymore, so spares for Nasa sounds plausible.The DJ wrote: ↑28 Jan 2023, 11:04Possibly for spares use? I remember seeing a photo of the D-model without ejection seats.patrick dirksen wrote: ↑26 Jan 2023, 22:15 -F/A-18s 163993 and 164058 were seen near the NASA area. Have these been transferred (and got a NASA registration) or are these just stored as I saw mentioned somewhere, maybe for future use by NASA?
As of today still no N-number(s) allocated.
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more