dennisblade1979 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 09:52
large hangaar
bo-105 87+15 ausbildungswerkstat Fassberg markings
(87+15) Bo.105P 6115 German Army i/a white c//s, Ausbildungswerkstat Fassberg markings, no c/n plate, c/n read on paperwork and bulkhead
Moderator: Jaap
Post all airshow-related items here. Please keep the postings as informative and to-the-point as possible. Refrain from postings with the sole intention to communicate whether you like the show or not, unless accompanied by arguments that can help others. |
dennisblade1979 wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 09:52
large hangaar
bo-105 87+15 ausbildungswerkstat Fassberg markings
Halle 9a contained 78+19 and 78+34. The reason the windows were covered was because the aircraft were taken apart and especially the sensitive parts were not to be photographed. Hence the paper in front of the windows.GIPS wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 11:17 some more additions:
Halle 9:
at least 2 x NH-90 TTH inside, but not noted by us
Halle 9a:
at least 2 x NH-90 TTH inside, but not noted by us
Halle 8:
a CH-53G fuselage was on the back of the right side, which could be (84+41), others say is was a Sea King fuselage?
78+05 was WFU according personal
Flightline:
SAG stands for Spezielles Ausbilungs Gerät, as advised by the mechanics standing next to it. So basically Special Training Device. By adding this, the number is not counted in the order of battle anymore (and doesn't officialy count in any arms reductions agreement).patrick dirksen wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 12:38
Tiger UHT 74+15 ihaz
=> this had SAG behind the serial, indicating it is an instructional aircraft
Also provided by the French and German chief mechanics around it (seperately). 2032 was crashed in Afghanistan. It contains the tail of an unknown French Tigre prototype. Possibly F-ZWWY (which is also here minus tail), but they could not confirm.Tiger HAP 2032 instr. Airframe tail is from a other aircraft not known
=> how was this identified? I presume it is correct, based on some sources, but I couldn't find any confirmation.
In the early morning when I visit this place, only the lefthand side of hangar was open .
Halle 10 righthandside was NH90 MTR+02 (no CH-53). Which is a training rig. Furthermore halle 10 contained 4 operational NH-90's (as per earlier log and serials on paper provided by the bothered, but helpfull mechanics ), excluding wfu 78+05 (which is a training rig now) as well as training rig MTR+1B, in bare metal c/s under the net). So a total of 7 NH-90's in halle 10.
K2G wrote: ↑10 Jun 2024, 21:54In the early morning when I visit this place, only the lefthand side of hangar was open .
Halle 10 righthandside was NH90 MTR+02 (no CH-53). Which is a training rig. Furthermore halle 10 contained 4 operational NH-90's (as per earlier log and serials on paper provided by the bothered, but helpfull mechanics ), excluding wfu 78+05 (which is a training rig now) as well as training rig MTR+1B, in bare metal c/s under the net). So a total of 7 NH-90's in halle 10.
We read 7917 and 7804. Another camo NH90 with NO serial on the boom was parked behind them , with the nose in 90• direction. Is this 7805 or a training rig ?
patrick dirksen wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 12:43The seeial could also be read under the paint with some difficulty. 43+41 confirmed.
The one on the left we did not read, because it was to dark inside.
7805 was left and the training rig on the right. 7917 and 7804 were in front of 7805K2G wrote: ↑10 Jun 2024, 21:54In the early morning when I visit this place, only the lefthand side of hangar was open .
Halle 10 righthandside was NH90 MTR+02 (no CH-53). Which is a training rig. Furthermore halle 10 contained 4 operational NH-90's (as per earlier log and serials on paper provided by the bothered, but helpfull mechanics ), excluding wfu 78+05 (which is a training rig now) as well as training rig MTR+1B, in bare metal c/s under the net). So a total of 7 NH-90's in halle 10.
We read 7917 and 7804. Another camp NH90 with NO serial on the boom was parked behind them , with the nose in 90• direction. Is this 7805 or a training rig ?
Thank you GIPS. Can you confirm the 7805 had a tailboom without a visual serial number applied?GIPS wrote: ↑10 Jun 2024, 23:227805 was left and the training rig on the right. 7917 and 7804 were in front of 7805K2G wrote: ↑10 Jun 2024, 21:54In the early morning when I visit this place, only the lefthand side of hangar was open .
Halle 10 righthandside was NH90 MTR+02 (no CH-53). Which is a training rig. Furthermore halle 10 contained 4 operational NH-90's (as per earlier log and serials on paper provided by the bothered, but helpfull mechanics ), excluding wfu 78+05 (which is a training rig now) as well as training rig MTR+1B, in bare metal c/s under the net). So a total of 7 NH-90's in halle 10.
We read 7917 and 7804. Another camp NH90 with NO serial on the boom was parked behind them , with the nose in 90• direction. Is this 7805 or a training rig ?
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more