Photo topic AMS 26-10-2007

ImageDedicated forum to share your own recent photos with the rest of the community.
Please note large files may exist here before you start browsing!

Forum rules
ImageThis is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum.
Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post.
In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.).

Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so.
Post Reply
User avatar
cHabu
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 5538
Joined: 22 Jan 2005, 20:49
Subscriber Scramble: cHabu
Location: Alkmaar / Wijchen
Contact:
Contact cHabu

Photo topic AMS 26-10-2007

Post by cHabu »

.

Hiya,

On my way to the AMC hospital, a short visit to Schiphol-east:

Image

N119AF, hurdling down runway 04...

Bye, Chris.
Image

=> Sync your files online and across computers with Dropbox. (2GB account is free!)

Only when you can share knowledge, can you enjoy knowledge !
Top
nustyR
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3374
Joined: 26 Oct 2005, 20:31
Contact:
Contact nustyR

Post by nustyR »

1 JAL 773

Image

2

Image

3

Image

4 Notice the bird enjoying the view.

Image

5 I really need 600mm in the future !

Image

6

Image

7 JAL-773 again

Image

8

Image

9

Image

10

Image

11

Image

12

Image

13

Image

14

Image

15

Image

16

Image

17

Image

18 SCARY ! ( crop from AirLingus Photo )

Image
Top
User avatar
Key
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11259
Joined: 06 Dec 2002, 09:21
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: U bet
Location: ex EHAM

Post by Key »

Wow, you got some VERY cool shots in there. The landing JAL is too dark on my screen though, very hard to make out much of the wonderful detail. Great to see some off the beaten track-work here!

Erik
Climb to 20ft, we're leaving a dust trail
Top
USAFE
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 530
Joined: 20 Oct 2006, 14:01
Contact:
Contact USAFE

Post by USAFE »

Superb quality! :D
Top
SpotterNL
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 708
Joined: 01 Mar 2005, 19:34

Post by SpotterNL »

Key wrote:Wow, you got some VERY cool shots in there. The landing JAL is too dark on my screen though, very hard to make out much of the wonderful detail. Great to see some off the beaten track-work here!

Erik
most of the shots are a bit dark actually
Top
User avatar
Sowald
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 589
Joined: 14 Jun 2006, 17:08
Type of spotter: Foto en nummer spotter.
Location: Lobith, Nederland
Contact:
Contact Sowald

Post by Sowald »

Maybe that is because they are taken in the evening.
I think they are absolutely great!!!

Rob.
Top
User avatar
Key
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11259
Joined: 06 Dec 2002, 09:21
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: U bet
Location: ex EHAM

Post by Key »

Sowald, it's not about the night. It's about how these wonderful shots have been processed.

Erik
Climb to 20ft, we're leaving a dust trail
Top
SpotterNL
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 708
Joined: 01 Mar 2005, 19:34

Post by SpotterNL »

Exactly. Even tho it is nighttime you can still get a proper exposure (perhaps even more so because you don't have any 'hard' sunlight). The floodlights at AMS provide more than adequate light for most of these shots (some pushback shots excluded). What settings did you shoot the gateshots at?
Top
nustyR
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3374
Joined: 26 Oct 2005, 20:31
Contact:
Contact nustyR

Post by nustyR »

SpotterNL wrote:most of the shots are a bit dark actually
I think you are right. On the promenade terrace I checked my photos and I thought they were bright enough. When I checked them at home at my computer they were way too dark. I think the brightness-settings of my camera-lcd-screen have misled me. Bummer !
I also notice a big difference between my main monitor ( CRT ) and my secondary monitor ( LCD ) when I watch these photos. On the LCD the photos contain a lot more grain, are darker and got some yellow flood on it.
SpotterNL wrote:What settings did you shoot the gateshots at?
Most of the shots were taken at 5 or 6 secs F10 / F13 and ISO 50 !! Next time I'm going to use some brighter settings :roll: This was my first serious nightshoot-attempt ever.
Top
User avatar
Key
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11259
Joined: 06 Dec 2002, 09:21
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: U bet
Location: ex EHAM

Post by Key »

Hi Nusty,
nustyR wrote:I think the brightness-settings of my camera-lcd-screen have misled me.
:arrow: Histogram! One of the most valuable features of a DSLR, imho (says a die-hard film photog :wink: ).
Your eyes adapt to the dark, so hardly any lighted display is suitable to make asessments from. On the bright side (no pun intended), since you saw enough detail even on that tiny screen, your originals must bear that detail and you can therefor reprocess them to make the pics even better.

About monitors, what you describe on your LCD is more like what my calibrated CRT shows, than your CRT. Apart from the grain that is, your photos look smooth to me.
In other words: your CRT probably needs some adjustment for photos, it is likely set too bright and blue (common 'problem' because it is very practical for daylight websurfing).

If this was your first attempt, I'm definitely looking forward to next ones!

Erik
Climb to 20ft, we're leaving a dust trail
Top
nustyR
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3374
Joined: 26 Oct 2005, 20:31
Contact:
Contact nustyR

Post by nustyR »

I re-calibrated my CRT and processed all the photos from scratch. Changed the white-balance and made the photos brighter.
I hope they're less dark now.

A

Image

B

Image

C

Image

D

Image

E

Image

F

Image

G

Image

H

Image

I

Image

J

Image

K

Image

L

Image

M

Image

N

Image

O

Image
Top
User avatar
Key
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11259
Joined: 06 Dec 2002, 09:21
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: U bet
Location: ex EHAM

Post by Key »

A world of difference. And I would certainly not make them lighter than they are now. Like that Aer Lingus close-up!

Erik
Climb to 20ft, we're leaving a dust trail
Top
SpotterNL
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 708
Joined: 01 Mar 2005, 19:34

Post by SpotterNL »

Key wrote:A world of difference. And I would certainly not make them lighter than they are now. Like that Aer Lingus close-up!

Erik
Got to agree, tho the grain is more visible now. Next year, try it in the camera ;). Got some shots myself, I think I'll post them later on in a new thread.
Top
User avatar
jaah
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 422
Joined: 19 Jul 2007, 16:38
Type of spotter: Mostly military
Subscriber Scramble: jaah
Location: Denmark

Post by jaah »

Wow, what a big difference, but it looks great.
Kind regards

Jonas
Top
User avatar
geert
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1277
Joined: 05 Oct 2002, 17:27
Location: IJsselmuiden, booming city near Kampen.
Contact:
Contact geert

Post by geert »

cHabu wrote:
On my way to the AMC hospital
I hope nothing serious????

Geert.
PH-BZF/G, PH-LMR, PH-BXR, PH-KCD, G-EUPR, G-EUUR.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Aviation Photo Forum”