Well no offense for anybody on Airfighters.com.Joris van Boven wrote: They may not host my photos anymore. http://www.airfighters.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is the place to be for me.
dat is ook mijn conclusie. >>ZIE HET ALS EEN WAARSCHUWING<<Stefan wrote:Ha,
Ben geen fotograaf maar vind dit proces wel interessant.
Het is een beproefde methode om met een 'proefballon' een wijziging aan te kondigen. Even proeven hoe ver de loyaliteit gaat. Zometeen komen de, definitieve, nieuwe TOU's uit en dan lijkt 'het mee te vallen' en worden ze als zoete koek geslikt.
........
Who are you to decide a photo is garbage ?ruudb wrote:I totally agree, they don't put garbage on their site like others do.A.net is the standard an i hope it stay,s like that.
But the advantage of airfighters is; it is militairy only Just my personal choice And airfighters is much younger than ailiners, sow this site will also grow in the next yearsandel wrote:Maybe im not making friends whit this but a worst viewed picture at A.net is still more viewed than an average pic on Airfighters.
A.net is the standard an i hope it stay,s like that.
Those are obviously two different things. That site being mil only means it limits its own abilities. For instance, Airfighters will likely not get me to put my photos there, because I don't limit myself to just mil.Redskin301 wrote:But the advantage of airfighters is;
Just my personal choice
Yes, it will. But given the fact that even JetPhotos still has just a fraction of the traffic A.net has, after all these years, I wouldn't get my hopes too high.And airfighters is much younger than ailiners, sow this site will also grow in the next years
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more