Moderator: Jaap
Post all airshow-related items here. Please keep the postings as informative and to-the-point as possible. Refrain from postings with the sole intention to communicate whether you like the show or not, unless accompanied by arguments that can help others. |
I know and I did although I initially overlooked the fact it wasn't your's. Me quoting that wasn't meant as a personal "attack" but just a general remark to underline the fact that majority of us photographers always seem to be suffering from the minority of photographers that will do anything for a clean shot, no matter what consequences, but that's just my personal frustration I guess..Janos wrote:Polleke this is NOT my text but from Blu109.
Please reed the whole part of my reaktion.
EHAM wrote: * Why can't the fire extinguisher be placed behind the aircraft? That is less ugly than in front of the a/c. Or is there a reason why this can't be done?
Take public transport. I do that for my whole life. You (can) know how the parking is at LWD. Spares another car that might contribute to a traffic jam. Shuttlebus drivers getting lost can be frustrating I admit. Experienced that kind of trouble the last time at Gilze and Texel.Tom Tiger wrote:Parking on the road, I hate it, but the organisation did a good job and I could get right on the shuttlebus (driver lost his way unfortunatly....)
Just got an idea how to deal with a toiletproblem for the liquid part. Might keep you posted.Tom Tiger wrote:The Toilet situation.... well I came early, I had a good spot so I didn't have a problem with it....and they were free. (I think I had to pay all those other times....)
I think these were very well signposted from the south side at the static, Besides, you entered at the place you should leave again. Had a lot worse experiences at Volkel in 2000. I think KLu changed something after I complained, From that year my suggestions were implemented, till the present day. correction, year.Tom Tiger wrote:3 different departure stations for the buses. This could have been marked a little better (my only really complaint)
Just return to the discussion where the clown said he wanted to run. It was for the B-17. No flying fortress so no running clown. Maybe next year at Volkel where the crowdline is a lot longer to run along. Allthough, some might go mad next year at the comments afterwards. There was some f(censored)ing idiot dressed up as a clown at their static pictures.Tom Tiger wrote:I missed the running clown though.... Never did see him
Tom Tiger schreef:
I missed the running clown though.... Never did see him
Just return to the discussion where the clown said he wanted to run. It was for the B-17. No flying fortress so no running clown. Maybe next year at Volkel where the crowdline is a lot longer to run along. Allthough, some might go mad next year at the comments afterwards. There was some f(censored)ing idiot dressed up as a clown at their static pictures.
Mildenhall had a good lay-out, in my opinion. But OK, you have to take what you get, and try to make the best of it. Everyone has to decide how to do that for themselves. There is one at the board with a signature that makes it all clear. I don't have it at this very moment, but it is like: You only have to please yourself, nobody else. Maybe shocking to read for some people, but the longer I think about it, (and stay at this topic) the more I get convinced that one is right.Thijs wrote:Everybody is complaining about the bad static lay-out but can somebody tell me at which airshow they have a good lay-out of the static?
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more