Thanks for posting

Tingy · Post by **Tingy** » 11 May 2009, 21:27

Edit: this is a follow-up from here.

Thanks for checking the Norwegians ,and all other regestrations every day again. That is really graet, and helps a lot.

The list from Aviation Org is fine, but every registration on it can`t be shoure, because it gives the actuality from around 24 hours agoo.
I am happy that this time Sjaak gives the recourse, so everyone has a choice to use this info or not.
I think it is OK to use the info from the Aviation org list, but please tell that the info recourse comes from this list, and not from actually sources like CCIS, or FIS or wathever.

Good luck all

Sjaak · Post by **Sjaak** » 11 May 2009, 22:10

Tingy wrote:Thanks for checking the Norwegians ,and all other regestrations every day again. That is really graet, and helps a lot.

The list from Aviation Org is fine, but every registration on it can`t be shoure, because it gives the actuality from around 24 hours agoo.
I am happy that this time Sjaak gives the recourse, so everyone has a choice to use this info or not.
I think it is OK to use the info from the Aviation org list, but please tell that the info recourse comes from this list, and not from actually sources like CCIS, or FIS or wathever.

Good luck all

What exactly do you mean with "this time"? I always mention the source! Further, to my knowledge the (very helpful and excellent list we should all cherish) on aviationphotos.org list IS the actual CISS list , but since it's normally posted the previous night it could be subject to change hence the Norwegians which eventually turned out to be KKT/KKG

Key · Post by **Key** » 11 May 2009, 23:33

It can be read as 'This time, you are the guy doing it right' - with the alternatives being others doing it right.

Erik

Tingy · Post by **Tingy** » 11 May 2009, 23:34

I tried to mention this very carefully,,,. I think it could be mentioned once in a while, for the those who are not so well informed about all kind of recourses.
I really like all the info witch is given on this forum.

Sjaak, thanks for reply. That you mentioned the source is OK , especially when you do that all the time. So nothing wrong with your message.
What I mean,with this time, is that it sometimes looks like that there are people who take info from the Aviation Org list, to this forum, without naming the source.
Than it looks like that this info is straight from CISS, witch it is not.

For me, and I am shore a lot of other spotters, it is a big differnce, if info especially about registrations, or arrivel times comes from the indeed excellent list, or straight from CISS.

SPL · Post by **SPL** » 12 May 2009, 00:15

Goedenavond,

de lijst met informatie van aviationphotos.org komt uit de staffpages. Andere overzichten, die ik bijvoorbeeld maak, komen uit het CISS. Echter beide informatie is hetzelfde. Op het moment dat ik iets plaats of Ton Jochems iets plaatst, dan is de informatie actueel, echter hoeft die niet correct te zijn. In de tussentijd kan er zoveel veranderen, zoals bijvoorbeeld een aircraft change. Echter, de actuele informatie op de Staffpages en het CISS kan ook niet correct zijn, door bijvoorbeeld een foute invoer (blijft mensen werk) of foute opgave in het vliegplan of noem maar iets anders.

Moraal van het verhaal: niets is 100% zeker tot je het bevestigd krijgt.

Groeten Martijn

Key · Post by **Key** » 12 May 2009, 00:48

Thanks Martijn, that helps to clarify. Pls. continue in English with additional posts.

Erik

Scramble Messageboard