Are the C-17's really NATO aircraft? It's the Strategic Airlift Consortium. Not all SAC members belong to NATO. Not all NATO members belong to SAC. I believe Sweden is a PfP member. However members who belong to both can use them for NATO missions, that doesn't make them NATO aircraft. Am I wrong?SquAdmin wrote:The text says "This first airlifter was financed by the USAF and wears a USAF registration.", but "01" sound more like a Hungarian military registration to me. Also funny to see that it's wearing a Hungarian Air Force roundel instead of NATO markings.
I'm not saying you're not telling the truth, but why would Dutch F-16's wear US regs? Most (if not all, I'm not that well informed on jets) of the F-16's are even built here in the Netherlands by Fokker, so I see absolutely no reason to put on US serials.. :Saviodromefriend wrote:Mind the RAF machines also wear USAF registrations applied thinner than the british (and don't the RNLAF F-16s wear USAF serials below the canopy?)
Well, the rule/US law is: all examples of US designed aircraft have a US type of registration. Other countries that operate them have the right to put on their own serials to, but that US registration MUST be applied. (sorry, I could have shown a picture as proof, if this wasn't from my analogue era, and my scanner was working .)kiwi wrote:I'm not saying you're not telling the truth, but why would Dutch F-16's wear US regs? Most (if not all, I'm not that well informed on jets) of the F-16's are even built here in the Netherlands by Fokker, so I see absolutely no reason to put on US serials.. :S
Clears it up! Thanksaviodromefriend wrote:Well, the rule/US law is: all examples of US designed aircraft have a US type of registration. Other countries that operate them have the right to put on their own serials to, but that US registration MUST be applied. (sorry, I could have shown a picture as proof, if this wasn't from my analogue era, and my scanner was working .)kiwi wrote:I'm not saying you're not telling the truth, but why would Dutch F-16's wear US regs? Most (if not all, I'm not that well informed on jets) of the F-16's are even built here in the Netherlands by Fokker, so I see absolutely no reason to put on US serials.. :S
I've never seen the old RNZAF Scooters with US serials.aviodromefriend wrote:Well, the rule/US law is: all examples of US designed aircraft have a US type of registration. Other countries that operate them have the right to put on their own serials to, but that US registration MUST be applied. (sorry, I could have shown a picture as proof, if this wasn't from my analogue era, and my scanner was working .)kiwi wrote:I'm not saying you're not telling the truth, but why would Dutch F-16's wear US regs? Most (if not all, I'm not that well informed on jets) of the F-16's are even built here in the Netherlands by Fokker, so I see absolutely no reason to put on US serials.. :S
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more