This is the forum to share your older or theme-based aviation photos, under the same conditions as the parent forum. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). |
No problem But which numbers didn't you like and which numbers did you likeDJMikey wrote:Personally I don't think my contributions to this topic are real Arty Farty in comparisson to some other contributions. Some of your shots Nusty are really nice, but imho your latest 2 - 3 postings to this topic are not that great. Sorry and no offence or disrespect intended, but I don´t see the Arty Farty factor. I´m sure you have some better pics to add.
Since you asked: IMO it is not.Jerrie wrote:Is this Arty?
Inflight cockpitview tb-200
Bye,
Jerrie
And IMO it is arty-farty. The angle of the photo makes it pretty arty-farty I think.marcel32us wrote:Since you asked: IMO it is not.Jerrie wrote:Is this Arty?
Inflight cockpitview tb-200
Bye,
Jerrie
I agree with Marcel, I don't see the arty part of this picture.....Maybe you can explain what is arty about it?Is this Arty?
Inflight cockpitview tb-200
Which angle are we talking about here? It's straight forward onto the "dashboard" with bad lighting and not even focussed. Nice snapshot in a nostalgic way if you were in that plane at that time, but nothing more then that.jeffreyklm wrote: And IMO it is arty-farty. The angle of the photo makes it pretty arty-farty I think.
Kind regards, Jeffrey.
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more