It is almost a 100% crop. When I saw the picture on my laptop screen I was quite happy. Next week I try some other nice pictures to post here.nustyR wrote:Harry Spotter wrote:Indeed! Prachtig/Awesome!@bendavid2
No. 2 is really a superb photo!
This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
It is almost a 100% crop. When I saw the picture on my laptop screen I was quite happy. Next week I try some other nice pictures to post here.nustyR wrote:Harry Spotter wrote:Indeed! Prachtig/Awesome!@bendavid2
No. 2 is really a superb photo!
Still saving some money for a bigger lens??Harry Spotter wrote:If I see how sharp/clear some you guys' photos are, makes me wonder if I should have my 100-400 serviced (7 yrs old), or if I should just simply blame myself (for my often soft photos).
Well done guys!
3 landing lights? Looks like one (on the rightwing) is broken (or turned off?).nustyR wrote:11
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more