Canadese premier wil geen "legergrijs" op "zijn" Airbus.....

ImageSocial talk, maar dan in het Nederlands. Dit is de opvolger van het Praethuis uit het BBS tijdperk. Tagline verplicht !

Forum rules
Image
Post Reply
User avatar
Stratofreighter
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 22192
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 08:02
Location: Netherlands

Canadese premier wil geen "legergrijs" op "zijn" Airbus.....

Post by Stratofreighter »

Image
Prime Minister Stephen Harper boards his plane, Airbus No.1, in May. The prime minister is the apparent winner of a tug of war with Canada’s military over the government’s VIP aircraft. (Adrian Wyld / CP)
http://thechronicleherald.ca/Canada/1227484.html
PM’s office wants Airbus paint job

Harper, MacKay disagree on colour

By DEAN BEEBY The Canadian Press
Mon, Feb 14 - 4:54 AM

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Stephen Harper has been locked in a lengthy tug of war with his defence minister over the future of the military’s VIP Airbus, newly disclosed documents show.

Peter MacKay has repeatedly rejected requests from the prime minister’s staff to have the Airbus painted a civilian white and red instead of its current military grey.

MacKay and senior officers argue that the white colour scheme would be too visible whenever the passenger jet is sent on troop and cargo missions to risky locales, as happens now when the aircraft is not needed by the prime minister or the Governor General.

Senior government officials say no final decision has been made.

But internal emails indicate the Privy Council Office — Harper’s own department — in fact ordered the military last September to arrange for the new paint job at the next scheduled maintenance.

Documents outlining the two-year tussle over the VIP plane were obtained by The Canadian Press under the Access to Information Act.

The air force owns five Airbus 310 transports, one of which is configured on the inside for VIPs.

Since early 2009, the Prime Minister’s Office has been raising the possibility of a civilian paint scheme with the minister of defence or directly with the military — only to be rebuffed repeatedly.

"As a result of the multi-role nature of this aircraft, which includes the transporting of Canadian Forces personnel and equipment into areas of operations, it has been painted in a colour scheme appropriate for those tasks," MacKay wrote in June 2009, dismissing the suggestion.

The repainting proposal originated early in 2009 by someone in close contact with the Prime Minister’s Office, and whose identity is withheld in the released documents.

In August 2009, MacKay repeated his initial opposition.

"I am confident that the current policies that govern Department of National Defence decisions regarding colour scheme and markings of all Canadian Forces aircraft ensure consideration of the many and varied missions and are made in the best interests of all those missions," he said in a terse email.

A spokesman for the Privy Council Office says the proposed paint job is still under discussion.

"No decision has been taken on this," said Raymond Rivet.

But a military email from last September suggests otherwise.

"PCO has received direction to proceed with the painting of Airbus 001 in its white configuration," a senior military officer reported to air force brass on Sept. 13.
November 2024 update at FokkerNews.nl....
User avatar
Aircolours
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 2946
Joined: 04 Mar 2004, 13:39
Subscriber Scramble: Aircolours
Location: Hoofddorp
Contact:

Re: Canadese premier wil geen "legergrijs" op "zijn" Airbus.....

Post by Aircolours »

Leven deze Canadese ambtenaren nog in de middeleeuwen of zo?? Op een radar maakt een wit of grijs kleurtje echt niets uit en een SAMmetje of ander raket-je is eveneens kleurenblind.... En dit soort mensen beslissen over leven en dood :( :( :(

Mogen deze kisten eigenlijk wel contrails maken, want tja, die zijn een tikje heel erg zichtbaar..... Ik zou zeggen: aan de grond houden deze kisten en ombouwen tot Stealth-A310, hoe die er dan ook uit mag zien. :roll: :roll: :roll:

Brgds, Peter
Post Reply

Return to “'t Praethuys”