This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
But I bet that had more to do with the location, than with the cameralazyweasel wrote:It was my first opportunity to try out the 1D Mk4 and it was worth the wait!!
The bridal wire drops into the sea following the launch. They used to 'catch' them but now they let them sink at a cost of about 700 Euros a piece!!ehusmann wrote:Nice, very nice shots! Number 18 makes me wonder though, is it supposed to take that cable along like that?
I don't agree. Your remark applies to 99,999% of all in-flight and "moving" aviation pictures. As long as props don't appear frozen in mid-air that is just fine by me. The panning effect you want is nice every once in a while, but it would get boring very fast if every photo would show that effect. I think in-focus backgrounds add to photos rather than take away. But that's my personal opinion ofcoursepjotrtje wrote:Just one remark, almost all images seem 'frozen' due to the shutterspeed. It's as if the Super Etendard in #23, and the Rafale in #10, are sitting still in mid-air...
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more