(Backlight
)
Greetings,
Douwe
This is a subscription only section
Want to read more? It's only €10/year.
No account yet? Just Create an account first and head to the shop
This is a subscription only section
Want to read more? It's only €10/year.
 | This is the forum to share your recent aviation photos with the rest of the community, being photos not older than six months at the moment of topic opening. Theme-based topics, not about recent events, should go into the sub-forum. Although we will not screen beforehand, we reserve the right to delete any images, especially if clearly unsharp or otherwise low in quality. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). Finally, bring any photo criticism understandable and to the point, not cynical or offensive! Simultaneously, do not feel offended by criticism per se, but simply explain your motives, taste et cetera, or ignore if you wish so. |
)
But Azores Glider? 
Indeed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Transat_Flight_236Boudewijn van Oirschot wrote:Nice shot Douwe!
What would your choice have been in that case? I have seen many pictures from your side with the same conditions, maybe you can handle PS a bit better with backlight problems!Ricardo 767-200ER wrote:That wasn't really a smart decision to stand on that sight of the runway around 14:00lt.Nice to see the "Azores Glider" in revised scheme !
(Backlight )
Greetz ricardo
/reeve.gif)
Yes, backlight. But in this case not that severe. And it does not ruin your photo as the fuselage certainly isn't "fully darkened". I actually quite like the strip of light along the roof. And the skies in the background are beautiful!Nice to see the "Azores Glider" in revised scheme !
(Backlight )
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more
/cathay.gif)