No problem Again, thank´s!Richard de Florennes wrote:sorry, that was a typo, correct is 526; double-checked all others, should be okF17_114PM wrote:Very nice log
by the way, was 516 not w/o 5.12.2007?
it is, together with NAF81 & 82, NAF48 showed T-264Bennie wrote:December 9th visitor: NAF48; I think a (K)DC10.
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more