Airlines and heavy photographic equipment

ImageImageDedicated forum for all your questions, remarks etc about (aviation) photography, digital as well as old fashioned film.

Forum rules
ImageImage
Post Reply
User avatar
squid
Scramble Newbie
Scramble Newbie
Posts: 27
Joined: 19 Sep 2012, 02:03
Type of spotter: Photograph it, a serial is just paint to brighten
Subscriber Scramble: no
Location: Hellas

Airlines and heavy photographic equipment

Post by squid »

Its my first time i will be travelling, actually three routes, with heavy photo equipment on airplane. A heavy back pack (lowepro Flipside 400 AW two bodies with battery grips, three light lenses, batteries, chargers, etc) and a 200-400 f/4, in its own Nikon carrying bag. Maybe also a carbon fibre tripod and gimbal head for this lens. What is there i need to know in relation to airlines, and/or any hints, tips, about airplane travelling with this equipment. Can i carry it as hand luggage? (i dont think theres that much room on seats ...) Can i trust it to go along with suitcases instead? etc

Thanks
Nick D.
User avatar
Thijs
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 5085
Joined: 10 Feb 2003, 13:42
Subscriber Scramble: Thijs
Location: West Intercourse Island
Contact:

Re: Airlines and heavy photographic equipment

Post by Thijs »

Nick,

With the regular airlines I always mention it is photo equipment when they start asking questions. In most cses it was ok, even when the weight was above limits ( for instance 7.5 kg with LOT)

Only issues I had were with the low cost airlines.

Never had any issues with no space available in the cabin. Even not on a ERJ135 of Continental, ok I was almost sitting on my backpack.

In my opinion it is better not take your tripod as hand luggage. Just to avoid problems.

Thijs

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Assume makes an ASS of U and ME.
User avatar
B767-300ER
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 8814
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 08:35

Re: Airlines and heavy photographic equipment

Post by B767-300ER »

Tripod not as carry on because security makes
Probleme of it.

I flew with Arke, Transavia, Vueling, KLM, Easy, Ryanair and Martinair.
When you have to much weight, email them in advance and its no problem by all 7 of them to take your stuff in the cabine, but not the tripod.

I always take my 40D 50D, batterypacks, batteries, 24-105, 70-200, 100-400, 15-85, 90 and 50 mm with me with my carry on lugage.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
All times are local times!

Regards, N.
User avatar
ehusmann
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 6090
Joined: 03 Aug 2005, 14:34
Location: Loures, Portugal

Re: Airlines and heavy photographic equipment

Post by ehusmann »

And to give an answer to the other side of the question:
squid wrote: Can i trust it to go along with suitcases instead?
In one word: no.

Just like any other place, things do get stolen from checked baggage. Especially if bags look like they contain valuables, it is not uncommon for the bag to be lost, or the contents to be taken out. And unless you insure it very well, you will not get anything near of the value in return.

Erwin
Image
User avatar
Alpha Kilo One
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 4496
Joined: 25 Apr 2005, 16:17
Type of spotter: F5
Subscriber Scramble: Jein 😉

Re: Airlines and heavy photographic equipment

Post by Alpha Kilo One »

And most important: When they steal your equipment, you don't have anything to make your photos with!

Ronald

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
"Nix bliev wie it es"
patrick dirksen
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3279
Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 00:12
Type of spotter: Mil & ex-mil, zowel nummers als platen!
Subscriber Scramble: patrick dirksen
Location: Eindhoven (en een beetje Epe)

Re: Airlines and heavy photographic equipment

Post by patrick dirksen »

First time I flew outside Europe (to the USA), I called the airline because I was having the same thoughts about my camera bag. They were not helpful at all. I was told that when my bag was too heavy and/or too big, I should send it as air freight ahead. Explaining that it was vulnerable and expensive photographic equipment didn't mean anything to the lady. She didn't say it, but she meant to say "bad luck, live with it".

Obviously I didn't send my camera bag in advance, and it turned out to be no problem at all. As a matter of fact I was surprised about the size (and weight!) of some of the "carry on bags" I saw in the plane. Some what we call in Dutch 'hutkoffers' (really big suitcases), which bthe travelers themselves couldn't even get into the overhead lockers on their own....

I don't remember which airline it was by the way, but it was an American one. I'm sure Frank will remember, if somebody really wants to know.

Either way, I often flew to other continents since, and never had a problem with either the size or the weight of my bag. Only single time was with a low cost carrier (Ryan Air) in Hungary.
Cheers,

Patrick Dirksen
Tristar Aviation
User avatar
B767-300ER
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 8814
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 08:35

Re: Airlines and heavy photographic equipment

Post by B767-300ER »

Terwijl ryanair juist bijna de soepelste handbagage regels heeft

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
All times are local times!

Regards, N.
grunt087
Scramble Newbie
Scramble Newbie
Posts: 25
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 22:51
Type of spotter: Military
Subscriber Scramble: grunt087

Re: Airlines and heavy photographic equipment

Post by grunt087 »

I fly from Germany usually on Ryanair to several airshows a year. Ryanair is the only airline that weighs carry on bags on a regular basis. This year Ryanair has seemed to relax their enforcement of the 10 Kg limit. Most of the airlines now allow your main carry on bag with the 10kg limit and a smaller additional bag. So now I can get two camera bodies and two large telephoto lens plus all the accessories and a change of clothes in a backpack and small personal bag. One method I used in the past was to wear a photographers vest with lots of pockets and put as much of the small heavy items like batteries and chargers, tablets in the vest. There is no limit on the weight of the stuff in your pockets of your vests or coat.
User avatar
Wellhead
Scramble Rookie
Scramble Rookie
Posts: 99
Joined: 24 Oct 2003, 23:02

Re: Airlines and heavy photographic equipment

Post by Wellhead »

Hello Nick,

I would try to fit the nikon 200-400 with your bodies in the lowe pro and
leave the nikon bag at home. I have the nikon 200-400 my self and never use
this bag because it has in my opinion not the protection a camera bag offers.
If the other lenses do not fit any more in your bag I would try the Think tank skin body bag
or something similar which can hold two smaller lenses, you only need to buy an
extra "koppelriem" for this bag. I use the skin body bag in combination with a think tank airport
acceleration and this has worked pretty well for me. One advantage with the Airport Acceleration is that it especially designed for airplane travel and it is les conspicuous in regards to a normal camera backpack.
And when traveling with my camera I only put the most important items in my camera bag
such as a charger, memory card, image tank, wereldstekker and my camera cleaning kit all other stuf
will be in my hold baggage.

I hope this helps you a bit more in making your decision. :D

Regards,

Ronald Noeken
User avatar
Iwan Bogels
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 2385
Joined: 06 Sep 2002, 06:59
Subscriber Scramble: Iwan Bogels
Location: N 52°13"31.2 E 4°29"57.5
Contact:

Re: Airlines and heavy photographic equipment

Post by Iwan Bogels »

I bought a Think Tank Airport Security photobag, which meets requirements (measurements) for intercontinental flights. It holds my 400/2.8, mounted on my camera, side-by-side with a 300/2.8 mounted on a camera. On the long end it stores a 70-200, plus two smaller lensen, two extenders, an external flash unit and an airband scanner.

My bag is considerably heavier that 20+ kg and so far I have never had any problems with it taking it up in the cabin. I did many intercontinental flights with it. Sometimes they asked about the size, but they never gave me any hassle about it.

But as they say: Behaalde resultaten uit het verleden bieden geen garanties voor de toekomst.
Fox2 - for everything about low flying in Wales........and more !!

Image
Post Reply

Return to “Photography”