USAF General: "praising A-10 is treason/verraad"...

ImageForum for news and discussions on miltary aviation matters.

Forum rules
Image
Post Reply
User avatar
Stratofreighter
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 22194
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 08:02
Location: Netherlands

USAF General: "praising A-10 is treason/verraad"...

Post by Stratofreighter »

http://www.dodbuzz.com/2015/01/16/gener ... s-treason/
General: Praising the A-10 to Lawmakers is ‘Treason’

General: Praising the A-10 to Lawmakers is ‘Treason’

January 16th, 2015 2:13 pm

A top U.S. Air Force general warned officers that praising the A-10 attack plane to lawmakers amounts to “treason,” according to a news report. :roll:

Maj. Gen. James Post, vice commander of Air Combat Command,
was quoted as saying,
“If anyone accuses me of saying this, I will deny it … anyone who is passing information to Congress about A-10 capabilities is committing treason,” :evil:
in a report published Thursday on The Arizona Daily Independent.

In a response to the news outlet, a spokesman at the command, based at Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia,
described the comments to attendees of a recent Tactics Review Board at Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada as “hyperbole.” :roll:
http://www.arizonadailyindependent.com/ ... nics-isis/

In an e-mail to Military​.com, spokeswoman Maj. Genieve David said, “The intent of his comments were to communicate the Air Force’s position and decision on recommended actions and strategic choices faced for the current constrained fiscal environment.”

She added, “Our role as individual military members is not to engage in public debate or advocacy for policy.”

The Air Force is seeking to retire its fleet of almost 300 of the Cold War-era gunships, known as the Thunderbolt II and nicknamed the Warthog,
even as pilots fly the aircraft — whose snub-nose packs a 30mm cannon — in the Middle East to attack targets affiliated with the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

Congress rejected the service’s requests to begin the process of divesting the low, slow-flying aircraft this year and included about $337 million in the budget to keep it in the inventory.

While they did allow the Air Force to move as many as 36 of the planes to back-up status, they blocked the service from sending any of them to the bone yard.

Air Force officials say they’ll renew the effort as part of the fiscal 2016 budget request, which is expected to be released in a couple of weeks.

In a briefing Thursday at the Pentagon, Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James said the service’s use of A-10 in U.S.-led air strikes against ISIS isn’t inconsistent with its strategy to eventually retire the plane. :roll:

“There are a number of strike platforms that are engaged” in the operation against ISIS, including the F-15 and F-16, she said.

The A-10 is “a great contributor, but so are the other aircraft,” she said.

Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh, himself a former Warthog pilot, said the proposed retirement of the gunship is “an emotional issue inside the Air Force.”

Pilots “love their airplane — they should love their airplane,” he said.

“For the Air Force … it’s a sequestration-driven decision,” Welsh said, referring to automatic, across-the-board budget cuts Congress and the White House agreed to in 2011 as part of deficit-reduction legislation.

The cuts are slated to return with greater effect in fiscal 2016 unless lawmakers agree on an alternative plan.

“We don’t have enough money to fund all the things that we currently have in our force structure,” Welsh said.

Even if the service’s request to retire the A-10 was approved as part of the fiscal 2015 budget, he added, the aircraft would have remained in service until 2019.

Sen. John McCain, the longtime Republican from Arizona and new chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee,
was part of a group of lawmakers who worked to preserve funding for the A-10.

““We are going to do away with the finest close-air-support weapon in history?” he questioned during a press conference last year on Capitol Hill.

The senator, a longtime critic of the F-35 fighter jet – the Pentagon’s most expensive weapons acquisition program designed to replace the A-10 and other aircraft – questioned why the Air Force would begin to get rid of the Warthog before it has started operational flights of the stealthy, radar-evading jet.

The F-35A is scheduled to reach initial operating capability, or IOC, in 2016 but only by employing a less lethal version of software.

“And we are then going to have some kind of nebulous idea of a replacement with an airplane that costs at least 10 times as much
— and the cost is still growing — with the F-35?” McCain said at the news conference.
“That’s ridiculous.”
November 2024 update at FokkerNews.nl....
User avatar
Piet Luijken
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3954
Joined: 27 Dec 2003, 14:19
Subscriber Scramble: Piet Luijken
Location: Amstelveen

Re: USAF General: "praising A-10 is treason/verraad"...

Post by Piet Luijken »

On the other hand:

Gen. Mark Welsh, the Air Force chief of staff:
"It's an emotional issue inside the Air Force too," he said. "I would be disappointed if the people who flew the A-10, if the people who train with the A-10 weren't emotional about this. They love their airplane. They should love their airplane. But for us, it's a sequestration-driven decision. We don't have enough money last year or this coming year to fund all of the things that we currently have in our force structure. But if we have the A-10 and there's a conflict that we can use it in appropriately, we should absolutely use it. It's not about not liking or not wanting the A-10. It's about some very tough decisions that we have to make to recapitalize an Air Force for the threat 10 years from now."
Greetings,

Piet Luijken
Scramble Editor
User avatar
Stratofreighter
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 22194
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 08:02
Location: Netherlands

Re: USAF General: "praising A-10 is treason/verraad"...

Post by Stratofreighter »

Perhaps we will hear somewhat more in future about general Post's comments...
2 star's 'treason' comments spark call for an investigation

A prominent lawmaker is calling for an investigation of a major general's reported comments blasting officers as treasonous if they work with Congress against Air Force plans to retire the A-10.

Maj. Gen. James Post, vice commander of Air Combat Command,
reportedly told officers at a recent meeting of the Tactics Review Board at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada,
that they were not to speak with Congress about the service's attempt to retire the attack jet.

"Anyone who is passing information to Congress about A-10 capabilities is committing treason,"
Post is quoted by former airman and blogger Tony Carr as saying.

Post reportedly prefaced his comments by saying
"if anyone accuses me of saying this, I will deny it," according to Carr's "John Q. Public" blog.

Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.,
who wants to keep the A-10 in service,
has called on Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James to investigate the reported comments,
McCain spokesman Dustin Walker told Air Force Times.

The A-10's biggest supporter on Capitol Hill, Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., told Air Force Times in a statement that she is "deeply disturbed" by the reported comments.

"U.S. law clearly states that 'No person may restrict a member of the armed forces in communicating with a member of Congress.'
continues at

http://www.airforcetimes.com/story/mili ... /22155219/
November 2024 update at FokkerNews.nl....
User avatar
sp00k
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 331
Joined: 23 Nov 2007, 10:28
Type of spotter: Photography, preferably 70/80`s Military Jets
Subscriber Scramble: sp00k
Location: Amersfoort, NL.

Re: USAF General: "praising A-10 is treason/verraad"...

Post by sp00k »

Replacing the A-10 in a CAS roll with the F-35 should be considered treason..
Soesterberg AB Spotter '84-'96
User avatar
Wildpicture
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 806
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 13:57
Type of spotter: F5 Military
Location: Flevoland
Contact:

Re: USAF General: "praising A-10 is treason/verraad"...

Post by Wildpicture »

sp00k wrote:Replacing the A-10 in a CAS roll with the F-35 should be considered treason..
Or at least plain stupidity.....
Post Reply

Return to “Military Aviation News”