Hi all,Hans van Herk wrote:Yuma sheds AV-8Bs from photos (all credit to Eddy)
[
VMA-214
165568/..-53
One week earlier we had 165566/53 on the static at El Centro air show
Greetz,
Frank Mink
http://www.tristaraviation.org
Hi all,Hans van Herk wrote:Yuma sheds AV-8Bs from photos (all credit to Eddy)
[
VMA-214
165568/..-53
Added some things from my pictures!warbird_nl wrote:Op 13 maart hebben we het volgende zien vliegen (alleen aanvullingen):Hans van Herk wrote:Yuma sheds AV-8Bs from photos (all credit to Eddy)
VMA-311
....../..-00
164566/..-01
165573/WL-0.
165567/WL-11
165382/..-..
165583/WL-14
164143/WL-20
164128/WL-21
164142/WL-22
VMA-214
165421/WE-02
165397/WE-04
165006/..-09
165429/..-06
165568/..-53
VMA-231
165357/CG-03
165311/09, seen flying the 12th with WL-04 (unit nn)
Regards,
Hans van Herk
VMA-214 - WE-09 - 165006
VMA-311 - WL-01 - 164566
VMA-311 - WL-00 - 164553
Groeten,
Sander
Jos,Tu154 wrote:warbird_nl wrote:Added some things from my pictures!Hans van Herk wrote:Yuma sheds AV-8Bs from photos (all credit to Eddy)
165311/09, seen flying the 12th with WL-04 (unit nn)
Groeten,
Sander
Jos
This was the unknown aircraft correct?Hans van Herk wrote:Paul,
There were two rows of F-35s. The second row only contained one F-35.
Hans van Herk
Thanks Hans. Could you take a closer look at code 53/165568 as it was noted as 165566 at El Centro the weekend prior? 165568 should be destroyed (or damaged and repaired) during an assault at Kandahar.Hans van Herk wrote:Paul,
correct on the F-35s.
As far as the Harriers is cobcerned, we "only" have the sixteen ones on the photos. They were as I remember correct in four rows.
Regards,
Hans van Herk
It is there, as (WL)-09Hans van Herk wrote:Paul,
I don't see 165311 in your overview anymore.
Eddy has a rather clear picture of it.
Hans
Oops, need glasses. Sorry, we do not have a photo showing the second CF-04.747woody wrote:It is there, as (WL)-09Hans van Herk wrote:Paul,
I don't see 165311 in your overview anymore.
Eddy has a rather clear picture of it.
Hans
The other F-35B has been reported as 169415/CF-04. Can anyone confirm this from a photo?
Thanks for confirming ‘53’! The picture is getting clearer and clearer now.Hans van Herk wrote:Oops, need glasses. Sorry, we do not have a photo showing the second CF-04.747woody wrote:It is there, as (WL)-09Hans van Herk wrote:Paul,
I don't see 165311 in your overview anymore.
Eddy has a rather clear picture of it.
Hans
The other F-35B has been reported as 169415/CF-04. Can anyone confirm this from a photo?
Was this one noted flying before or after the airshow?
Regards,
Hans van Herk
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more