Have a very hazy shot that shows ??-0003, or something close to that, from Wednesday afternoon, loaded with LGBs. Unfortunately the angle and the haze make it difficult to read. (From the database the options seem to be 91-0003, 92-0003, 93-0003 or 88-0033). Anyone?AndyMarden wrote:Chris,
Thanks for posting the log, and good work with all the F-16 units! A few bits from me:
F-16 93-0008 (markings anyone?) was in the hangar on the main ramp on Tuesday. When we left on Wednesday it had been replaced by another from the main ramp.
93-0078 should read 93-0678
88-0003 is not valid. I don't have anything like it.
I didn't log 90-0007 - confirmation anyone please?
Andy
Concur!NF-5: I don't think 3001/01 was present (this was WO). Confusion with 4001?
Thanks, missed that one!Add 4009, a second B with code 4
Have photos of it coded 2. It's the one that was towed by on Tuesday, and on the F-4 line that evening.I logged 3072 with code 5, but might be mistaken
Thanks, corrected.AndyMarden wrote:Rod Burden notes that the Scramble Orbat pages record that 143 Filo became 153 Filo at Merzifon after the failed coup but then became 193 Filo at Balikesir.
So 143 Filo should read 193 Filo.
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more