Kisten die terugkeren naar Schiphol, incidenten, enz.

ImageImageForum for all matters concerning Amsterdam-Schiphol airport (and control zone, including heliport). Customary language is Dutch, but English is also accepted.

Moderator: gatso76

Forum rules
ImageImage
Post Reply
User avatar
Key
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11246
Joined: 06 Dec 2002, 09:21
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: U bet
Location: ex EHAM

Re: Kisten die terugkeren naar Schiphol, incidenten, enz.

Post by Key »

EHAM wrote:but according to the right of way rules a landing aircraft has precedence over a taxiing aircraft.
At an uncontrolled airfield, yes. In this case, it is rather unlikely right of way had much to do with it. Moreover, the definition of a runway incursion does not include 'right of way'. And finally, 'runway incursion' implies something that may not be the case here, especially to less informed people - like those reading with us and sometimes blowing up matters just to have a story. I don't like when that happens, thus the question.
B767-300ER wrote:It Could also be the controller who made the mistake!
It does not have to be a mistake. Sometimes, manoeuvres at an airfield take longer than anticipated, for various reasons. That can lead to a runway still occupied with an aircraft on short final, in which case a go-around is often the best option. That is, most of the time, still a fully-controlled situation. I am not saying it was in this case because I don't know, but I oppose to suggestions it was not before facts are clear. That's all. 8)

Erik
What four words, Jimmy!?!
User avatar
Key
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11246
Joined: 06 Dec 2002, 09:21
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: U bet
Location: ex EHAM

Re: Kisten die terugkeren naar Schiphol, incidenten, enz.

Post by Key »

FYI: the above was indeed a missed approach initiated by the controller, because the planned crossing took too long.

Erik
What four words, Jimmy!?!
User avatar
EHAM
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3414
Joined: 30 Apr 2005, 21:32
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: Joost de Wit
Location: Hoofddorp
Contact:

Re: Kisten die terugkeren naar Schiphol, incidenten, enz.

Post by EHAM »

Key wrote:FYI: the above was indeed a missed approach initiated by the controller, because the planned crossing took too long.
And why would that not be a runway incursion?
ICAO wrote:Runway incursion. Any occurrence at an aerodrome involving the incorrect presence of an aircraft, vehicle or person on the protected area of a surface designated for the landing and take-off of aircraft.
I think this describes exactly what happened yesterday; nothing has been blown up. It does not matter whether it was pilot error, ATC error or just bad timing.

Also I think right of way has quite a bit to do with it. See below quotes from ICAO Annex 2 chapter 3.2 Avoidance of collsions:
ICAO wrote:3.2.2.5.1 An aircraft in flight, or operating on the ground or water, shall give way to aircraft landing or in the final stages of an approach to land.
and:
ICAO wrote:Note 1.— It is important that vigilance for the purpose of detecting potential collisions be exercised on board an aircraft, regardless of the type of flight or the class of airspace in which the aircraft is operating, and while operating on the movement area of an aerodrome.
On a side note: today I saw another go-around/missed approach (only on FR24 this time). It concerned flight KLM50V/KL1926 approaching runway 18C around 1030h LT. Based solely on FR24 observation, it looks like there was a vehicle on the runway.
Joost de Wit
Image
User avatar
B767-300ER
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 8814
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 08:35

Re: Kisten die terugkeren naar Schiphol, incidenten, enz.

Post by B767-300ER »

Because it wasn't an incorrect presence ;-)
All times are local times!

Regards, N.
User avatar
ATCSpooky
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 298
Joined: 31 Oct 2007, 21:01
Type of spotter: Eerst de foto dan het nummer.... (F..)
Subscriber Scramble: ATCSpooky
Location: In the Southwest....

Re: Kisten die terugkeren naar Schiphol, incidenten, enz.

Post by ATCSpooky »

Here we go again.... :cry:
Many have an image of me; few get the picture
User avatar
Key
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11246
Joined: 06 Dec 2002, 09:21
Type of spotter: F2
Subscriber Scramble: U bet
Location: ex EHAM

Re: Kisten die terugkeren naar Schiphol, incidenten, enz.

Post by Key »

B767-300ER wrote:Because it wasn't an incorrect presence
Exactly.
EHAM wrote:It does not matter whether it was pilot error, ATC error or just bad timing.
It matters entirely.
I appreciate your interest in these matters, Joost. Correct interpretation of the rules isn't always easy. PM me for more explanation if you wish, I will be happy to give it.

Erik
What four words, Jimmy!?!
User avatar
Hurricane
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 5415
Joined: 05 Oct 2003, 18:03
Type of spotter: F4 + H5
Subscriber Scramble: Hurricane
Location: EHVB

Re: Kisten die terugkeren naar Schiphol, incidenten, enz.

Post by Hurricane »

For those who wish to express their FR24 theories and other related chit-chats can go wild -> here please
Groeten,
Ron
User avatar
Arjenp
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1678
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 09:58

Re: Kisten die terugkeren naar Schiphol, incidenten, enz.

Post by Arjenp »

SAS1583 (B738, LN-RRJ) van ARN naar AGP gaat straks uitwijken naar AMS vanwege een technisch probleem. Zal eerst nog de nodige tijd in de NARSO holding doorbrengen.
joost
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3303
Joined: 10 Jan 2003, 20:09
Location: Grave
Contact:

Re: Kisten die terugkeren naar Schiphol, incidenten, enz.

Post by joost »

Looks BLuescan 351 is going to divert to Schiphol due to medical situation.
Showing SE-RFX
User avatar
XYZ
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 4303
Joined: 28 Feb 2003, 17:54

Re: Kisten die terugkeren naar Schiphol, incidenten, enz.

Post by XYZ »

joost wrote:Looks BLuescan 351 is going to divert to Schiphol due to medical situation.
Showing SE-RFX
TuiFly B738
joost
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 3303
Joined: 10 Jan 2003, 20:09
Location: Grave
Contact:

Re: Kisten die terugkeren naar Schiphol, incidenten, enz.

Post by joost »

Another medical: DAL74 sceduled to arrive at Amsterdam off course but now on 120.875
Showing N845MH
User avatar
Alpha Kilo One
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 4496
Joined: 25 Apr 2005, 16:17
Type of spotter: F5
Subscriber Scramble: Jein 😉

Re: Kisten die terugkeren naar Schiphol, incidenten, enz.

Post by Alpha Kilo One »

Transavia HV792 from Preveza (Sept 5) returned home after a delay of more than 12 hours, due to one of the thrust reversers (left one) gave a warning during landing at Preveza.
Technician was flown in, who secured the bolts, avoiding any unexpected things.
Landing was without any problems (and without thrust reversing, which is no problem at all) Sept 6 at 00.17 hours.
"Nix bliev wie it es"
catbird
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 194
Joined: 21 May 2011, 10:51
Type of spotter: military
Subscriber Scramble: nee

emergency

Post by catbird »

Delta 135 declare a emergency
hit a seagull on the engine and landing gear
catbird
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 194
Joined: 21 May 2011, 10:51
Type of spotter: military
Subscriber Scramble: nee

Re: emergency

Post by catbird »

on 123.700
User avatar
Arjenp
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1678
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 09:58

Re: emergency

Post by Arjenp »

Gebruik dit topic a.u.b.
Post Reply

Return to “Amsterdam - Schiphol”