![:uhuh:](/forum/images/smilies/uh.gif)
Moderator: Jaap
![]() |
When this info is correct the T7 might be a JAL one (only one to use -346ER's) and how come the C160 is historic?jimmy van drunen wrote:Yeah![]()
Boeing:
B777-346 ER
Historic Aircraft:
C-160 Transall
Not sure how far it is on the production line, but our next one will be msn 36128, to be registered JA741J.Hurricane wrote:When this info is correct the T7 might be a JAL one (only one to use -346ER's)jimmy van drunen wrote:Yeah![]()
Boeing:
B777-346 ER
I don't now! Credits: http://www.paris-air-show.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Hurricane wrote:When this info is correct the T7 might be a JAL one (only one to use -346ER's) and how come the C160 is historic?jimmy van drunen wrote:Yeah![]()
Boeing:
B777-346 ER
Historic Aircraft:
C-160 Transall
Adios,
Hurricane.
funny remark in the forum on this thread...SquAdmin wrote:Speculation about the reasons why the F-22 is not showing up: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/de ... d=blogDest" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
(the cost of bringing it over, the fact that it's not for sale anyway and possible espionage by the French)
didn't know this , but would have loved to have been be there at that timeBy the by, espionage is not easy to avoid if the host nation's "customs" officials are allowed to poke into every nook and cranny of an aircraft for as many hours as they want. That's what happened with the F-117 at Paris and that's why the F-22 has not been to Paris before this year. That's not speculation. That's what the USAF says.
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more