...."And think we depend on these people to protect us and our National security!"....
"Fortunately" this blooper occurred somewhere in an office, not out there in a place of real-life war.tva2 wrote:and a reader's response into the matter ....
By 'WillGill'...."And think we depend on these people to protect us and our National security!"....
The second part of your comment is very true. With the economic state of the US at the moment, creating jobs will be paramount in this bidding war. However, I do not agree with the first part. The US has many more ´foreign´ airplanes and helicopters in service right now than many would like to admit. AV-8, T-45, T-6, UH-72 to name just a few. And do remember the A330 was selected before (as was the B767 by the way, equalling the score).Wildpicture wrote:But then again the whole bid proces is one big joke. As if the USA would ever want to depend on a "foreign" weapon system and (especially in this economical crisis) would ever have "foreign" jobs instead of domestic ones......
You are right, but most are trainers or "utility systems". The Harrier is a true weapons system. But other then the original design, there is very little British about an AV-8 anymore. (and perhaps that is a good thing )ehusmann wrote:The US has many more ´foreign´ airplanes and helicopters in service right now than many would like to admit. AV-8, T-45, T-6, UH-72 to name just a few.
The amount of jobs created/retained in CONUS is roughly the same for both the KC-767 and the KC-45... So that is not an issue.Wildpicture wrote:As if the USA would ever want to depend on a "foreign" weapon system and (especially in this economical crisis) would ever have "foreign" jobs instead of domestic ones...
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more