![Smile :-)](/forum/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
![I worship thee :worship:](/forum/images/smilies/worshippy.gif)
With all due respect, I only think your border sux, its too big and loud, and it degrades your pics. If i shot that many cool shots i'd design a super subtile border or no border at all, but only a logo. Just my thoughts
![]() | This is the forum to share your older or theme-based aviation photos, under the same conditions as the parent forum. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). |
dinovandoorn wrote:some more HDR stuff with a reduced border
Hi Spacecake,Spacecake wrote:[two pics]
You are certainly right there pjotrtje, but that is just the effect off this changing picture, if you check the grass in the previous one, you don't see the spots, same goes for the noise on the nose. I think you have found the ultimate way of post processing Dino, as far as i'm concerned!.. Excellent..!pjotrtje wrote:Looking at most of the pics in the various HDR threads: HDR gives a nice arty-farty effect. However, Dino's last contribution shows the real difference: HDR seems to introduce effects that weren't there in the first place. I honestly like the original better!
(HDR was originally meant to be used for long term exposures with different aperture settings (to ensure maximum contrast and quality in the end result), not for multiple 'interpretations' of the same 'negative'.)
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more