Yevilton 1978 and 1979
I wonder, did he try the sky jump...... or not
This is a subscription only section
Want to read more? It's only €10/year.
No account yet? Just Create an account first and head to the shop
This is a subscription only section
Want to read more? It's only €10/year.
 | This is the forum to share your older or theme-based aviation photos, under the same conditions as the parent forum. For more information on how to upload you images, check this post. In topic titles, please use airfield names in stead of just codes, and be clear about what kind of photos your viewers can expect (e.g. CIV/MIL, location etc.). |
Seconded! Kodachrome 25 instead of 64? No grain at all.Basman wrote:
Beautiful stuff again! These pics look as if they were made yesterday, so 'fresh' and clean.
Bas
Right, but sometimes when the days are short and the light is weak, je need some ASA CK 64 is the alternative. Beside there was a time CK 25 was hard to get.Hans Rolink wrote:Seconded! Kodachrome 25 instead of 64? No grain at all.Basman wrote:
Beautiful stuff again! These pics look as if they were made yesterday, so 'fresh' and clean.
Bas
Hans.
May I ask, what is your workflow? Apart from Photoshop CS5 I see in your EXIF info, do you use noise and grain removal software?Aardvark wrote: Right, but sometimes when the days are short and the light is weak, je need some ASA CK 64 is the alternative. Beside there was a time CK 25 was hard to get.
Hans Rolink wrote:May I ask, what is your workflow? Apart from Photoshop CS5 I see in your EXIF info, do you use noise and grain removal software?Aardvark wrote: Right, but sometimes when the days are short and the light is weak, je need some ASA CK 64 is the alternative. Beside there was a time CK 25 was hard to get.
Hans.
behind where now BP is located...Aardvark wrote:Nice Eagle Roel, where have you spot that one
Hi Aardvark,Aardvark wrote: Haha, good question. The important thing is, always by careful with your slides. They are over 30 years old and I always tread them as a baby, or even better.
Oké I start with a triple pass scan in my Minolta Dimage Dual scan II, using Vuescan. The original Minolta software don’t support Windows 7 and Vuescan is a good replacement for the original packets. Then I use PS CS5 indeed. I use a range of options within PS and have no order, just adjust until you think it is right. Every slide is different, so every workflow in PS is different. I use schaduw/hooglicht, layers to adjust hoogdoorlatend, kleurtonen, kleurbalance, kanaalmixer, curves and of course the retoucheer pencel. Sometimes I use the auto functions to get an idea what the best options are and adjust it manually. Last but not least Imagenomic noiceware pro (plug in) for noise reduce. And then when you have a nice good quality slide you get an even better digital image.
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more
/cathay.gif)
