Will they do this with their own recorded material, or will they get access to the material shot for the big screens too? If the latter, I might be interested.jeroenvermeer wrote:I have been in contact with PlanesTV. They just want a DVD / Blu-ray release of the Volkel show, if they get many requests. Maybe the people, who are interested in the footage, on this forum can also send a e-mail to them? I saw the teaser on Youtube, very spectacular!
That will be their own material, I think...aviodromefriend wrote:Will they do this with their own recorded material, or will they get access to the material shot for the big screens too? If the latter, I might be interested.jeroenvermeer wrote:I have been in contact with PlanesTV. They just want a DVD / Blu-ray release of the Volkel show, if they get many requests. Maybe the people, who are interested in the footage, on this forum can also send a e-mail to them? I saw the teaser on Youtube, very spectacular!
Joe Kurr wrote:I agree with Snipes on this one.pollypeter wrote:Snipes wrote:I liked the show(was there on saturday), but one thing I really don't understand... We were standing about 15 ft behind the fence(static line) watching and photographing the airplanes. And then there are those spotters/photographers who think they are there alone and stand in front of you with their ladders, blocking our view completely !!!! To those, please keep in mind that there are people behind you who also like to watch the show!!!! At one time there was a complete wall of people on their step-ladders. Not to take a pic of a static aircraft, I don't have problems with that, but standing there all the time...
Idea for next year: bring a ladder yourself...
I'm sorry, but I was also one of the many spotters standing on a ladder...and I do not regret that. Because without a ladder it is just impossible to make good photos on the runway. A ladder just belongs to the standard inventory for an airshow.
I don't have any problems with ladders, as long as they position themselves several meters from the fence.
What I don't understand is people using a ladder AT THE FENCE.
Come on, the fence isn't really that high, you can easily see over it when you're on the ground.
Also, do you really think that one meter higher really makes that much of a difference for taking runway pics? The difference on or off a ladder is a staggering 0.3 degrees.
As you may have noticed, a lot of activities were still going on in the exhibition part of the airshow, meaning a spot more to the left would have interfered with all the work being carried out there. Remember that you are a privileged guy being able to visit the base on thursday, my own family can't , and I have being working there for almost 20 years.....navygm wrote: Spotters day on thursday...
crowd line was put only near the elevated platform and that area... why not in front of the vacating taxiway to the left before they entered the apron!!?? half the aircraft went there especially the Corsairs! then infront of us they park light aircraft and others which are not interesting! and by d way they blocked access to runway photographs
Runway for photography was toooo much far for normal lenses up to 400mm, in my opinion photographers were to be put closer to runway (like those United Tv trailers were put )
A Su-22 is a little too big for our small parallel runway, let alone three. The F-16s needed their big external pylontanks removed so needed a lot of equipment. On thursday afternoon I talked to the pilot of the Swedish Viggen about getting closer to the crowd. But they didn't have a towbar and he wasn't too happy with using reverse thrust to get into position. It would blow up a lot of dust/FOD/grass etc. So the decision was made to keep him where he was. And the blue Mi-24 was parked on the static (wasn't planned) just like the Austrian PC-7 and the second Rafale......All the aircraft you mention flew by the way, and could be photographed with a proper lensFriday airshow day...
who the hell decided to put some of the most interesting aircraft on the other side of the airfield!!?? Su22s, Turkish F16, Viggen , Mil24,and etc... these should be put infront of crowd line and watch them taxi infront of you! and replace them with all those light aircraft infront of the crowds.
This one really takes the cake!!!! Two Chinooks flying, one static. Five Apaches flying (one from static), and two in static. Yes; I am going to tell you the Chinook and two Apaches in the exhibition were static, because they didn't move.... If you weren't able to photograph at least one of the Chinooks or one of the Apaches in the flying- or Airpower display than that is completely your mistake.We came for an airforce day and most of the air power of the RNAF was not on show... Chinook no good static, Apache no good static, Aluette!! no static, Kdc10 no static or at least a touch n go, special F16s (like one marked AZ) no static. Please dont tell me apache and chinook there were static because they were in the middle of the crowd and cannot be photographed.
Sure, they should have decided that on friday afternoon....It takes a lot of planning and meetings to arrange something 'simple' as a spottersday, and a lot of people are involved. Those people really have other stuff to do on sunday, and can't be made available for another spottersday.Last but not least... they should have made at least anther spotters day on sunday for the departure as alot of aircraft or practically all landed before thursday or in grey colours due to clouds and lots of rain...
Big LOL. You obviously have no clue how many spotters are involved with the airshow and especially the spottersday in one way or the other....and especially if the airforce had spotters clubs involved or help, these details should have been noted I think.
Thanks for that, but due to your comments above I feel you are not being sincere.....Thank to everyone involved in this airshow
I really want to thank you for all the effort you and the RNLAF team did to organize two beautiful days. I was there on friday and saturday and I had two wonderful days. It is really nice to see how so much people can enjoy air shows like these. I was smiling all day. There are always people/spotters who have a lot of commentary about the show and think they can organize a show like this better, but these people are in a minority. Just think of the 220.000 who had two wonderful days when you organize the next air show!orange wrote:As a guy who put in a lot of hours to try and make this airshow a success, I really have to react to your post because quite frankly it pisses me off...
I'm glad I left the car at homeBasman wrote:One remark on the traffic jams: I got terribly stuck in traffic on saturday but I'm afraid I have to blame myself for a great deal. Firstly, being with young kids I didn't want to leave home too early, knowing that the day could get too long for them. If I would have been on my own I would have been at the gates at 8. Secondly, coming from Arnhem I ignored the advice to take the A73 but instead took the exit Ravenstein, as that is what I had done on thursday. This lead me straight into the biggest traffic jam the south of holland has seen in recent years. In total, it took me 3.5 hours to get from home to the parking. I wonder how long it would have taken me if I had followed the advice to follow direction Boxmeer.....Luckily, I ended up at a parking lot very close to the main gate, so at least the walking time was limited.
Clearly you're not an expert on the subject, this is your opinion don't make this a fact!KIER wrote:
The biggest factor to make it good or bad is ALWAYS in hands of air traffic control of the base. For example RIAT ; 15 years back the amount of participating aircraft was 200%-300% higher , and even now airtraffic control is not in the possibility to let all aircraft fly or taxi in front of the aviation enthausiasts.
Kier
AFAIK there was never a Tornado on the list.OscarM wrote:Indeed. Does anybody know more about what happened to the 'expected' Tornado?Basman wrote: The only plane I think I missed (as in ''would be logical to show to the general public for its importance in NATO") was the Tornado.
Thanx
Oscar
Yes indeed. The bus transport to and from Oss was excellent. In the morning I had to wait less then a minute and the waiting time at the end of the day was similar. Very well done!nuckleuz wrote:I'm glad I left the car at homeBasman wrote:One remark on the traffic jams: I got terribly stuck in traffic on saturday but I'm afraid I have to blame myself for a great deal. Firstly, being with young kids I didn't want to leave home too early, knowing that the day could get too long for them. If I would have been on my own I would have been at the gates at 8. Secondly, coming from Arnhem I ignored the advice to take the A73 but instead took the exit Ravenstein, as that is what I had done on thursday. This lead me straight into the biggest traffic jam the south of holland has seen in recent years. In total, it took me 3.5 hours to get from home to the parking. I wonder how long it would have taken me if I had followed the advice to follow direction Boxmeer.....Luckily, I ended up at a parking lot very close to the main gate, so at least the walking time was limited.
I was really positively surprised on the efficiency of the busses from Oss to the base. It went so quick! There were sufficient busses to transport all the visitors to the base. But I didn't expect it to be so quick.
Grt,
Erik
As a member you get access to all our
premium content and benefits learn more