EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

ImageSocial talk and other non-aviation topics including photos. Note this a FUN area!

Forum rules
Image
User avatar
Stratofreighter
Scramble Master
Scramble Master
Posts: 22069
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 08:02
Location: Netherlands

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

Post by Stratofreighter »

There is also a market for small General Aviation at Amsterdam, perhaps we should have them in again en-masse as well?
Do you happen to know why Rotterdam doesn't get that many small General Aviation visitors any more over the last few years? We do... :roll:
It's called something like "handling charges" which now applies to all visiting aircraft.
SpotterNL
Scramble Die-Hard
Scramble Die-Hard
Posts: 708
Joined: 01 Mar 2005, 19:34

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

Post by SpotterNL »

Stratofreighter wrote:
There is also a market for small General Aviation at Amsterdam, perhaps we should have them in again en-masse as well?
Do you happen to know why Rotterdam doesn't get that many small General Aviation visitors any more over the last few years? We do... :roll:
It's called something like "handling charges" which now applies to all visiting aircraft.
And what's your point? The airport decided (just like Amsterdam) that the core business wasn't small GA visitors. A small aircraft uses a certain part of the noisequota, just like bigger aircraft do. In order to maximise revenue, you pay for use of that quota. Sounds like a good idea from a business point of view.

Now, from the GA point of view, that's an entirely different story, but that's not the point here.
Backtrack
Scramble Junior
Scramble Junior
Posts: 203
Joined: 10 Jan 2006, 11:59
Subscriber Scramble: Backtrack
Location: Schiedam

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

Post by Backtrack »

flying_kiwi wrote: As the saying goes, when one door closes, another opens.

I wouldn't necessarily describe the opportunities as missed, as it's more likely that those opportunites were turned down as part of the greater strategy/long-term plan. Aside from that, I suspect that the opportunities mentioned in the other thread, were merely options for the companies in question, and by no means a guarantee that had the management of the airport at the time decided to persue these opportunities, they still would have happened.

As Key said, I'm surprised how much of a ruckus this relatively minor event has caused, and especially how the airport (and it's management) is being blamed for perfectly reasonable business decisions made by the handling company.

Yorden
I've got the impression that the airport accepted the flight as the airport authority innitially gave slots for this flight. So apperantly from the airport side is was okay. And as far we can see from here same was only countermanded by the fact of the handling not being able to serve the An12. Which by all means remains rediculous if that is treu.
User avatar
skycruiser
Scramble Addict
Scramble Addict
Posts: 1957
Joined: 19 Mar 2005, 21:46
Subscriber Scramble: skycruiser
Location: AMS

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

Post by skycruiser »

Backtrack wrote: I've got the impression that the airport accepted the flight as the airport authority innitially gave slots for this flight. So apperantly from the airport side is was okay.
Slots are not granted by the airport authority, but by the government.
User avatar
Pieter
Scramble Senior
Scramble Senior
Posts: 360
Joined: 03 Jun 2003, 23:00
Type of spotter: F-1 - F-2
Subscriber Scramble: Pieter
Location: Den Haag
Contact:

Re: EHRD 22-03-2010 - no An-12

Post by Pieter »

I did send a letter to Mr van Aartsen, the mayor of my hometown The Hague that the name of our beautyfull city must disappear from Rotterdam The Hague "Airport".

No way that our name must be linked to an "airport" that can't handel a An-12.

For sure he will agree and I think Mr Aboutaleb (mayor of Rotterdam) has the same opinion and in the near future that piece of land will be called Zestienhoven again.

Regards,

Pieter :wink:
Post Reply

Return to “Tattle Lounge”